Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction

In this paper, we examine how an increased use of biomass could efficiently meet Swedish energy policy goals of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and oil use. In particular, we examine the trade-offs inherent when biomass use is intended to pursue multiple objectives. We set up four scenarios in which up to 400 PJ/year of additional biomass is prioritised to reduce CO2 emissions, reduce oil use, simultaneously reduce both CO2 emission and oil use, or to produce ethanol to replace gasoline. Technologies analysed for using the biomass include the production of electricity, heat, and transport fuels, and also as construction materials and other products. We find that optimising biomass use for a single objective (either CO2 emission reduction or oil use reduction) results in high fulfilment of that single objective (17.4 Tg C/year and 350 PJ oil/year, respectively), at a monetary cost of 130–330 million €/year, but with low fulfilment of the other objective. A careful selection of biomass uses for combined benefits results in reductions of 12.6 Tg C/year and 230 PJ oil/year (72% and 67%, respectively, of the reductions achieved in the scenarios with single objectives), with a monetary benefit of 45 million €/year. Prioritising for ethanol production gives the lowest CO2 emissions reduction, intermediate oil use reduction, and the highest monetary cost.

[1]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[2]  André Faaij,et al.  Outlook for advanced biofuels , 2006 .

[3]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy conservation and conversion of electrical heating systems in detached houses , 2007 .

[4]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings , 2006 .

[5]  Anders Ådahl.  Process Industry Energy Projects in a Climate Change Conscious Economy , 2004 .

[6]  P. Börjesson.  Energy Analysis of Biomass Production and Transportation , 1996 .

[7]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Experience curves: A tool for energy policy assessment , 2003 .

[8]  P Ahlvik,et al.  "WELL-TO-WHEEL" EFFICIENCY FOR ALTERNATIVE FUELS FROM NATURAL GAS OR BIOMASS , 2001 .

[9]  Kenneth Möllersten.  Opportunities for CO2 Reductions and CO2-Lean Energy Systems in Pulp and Paper Mills , 2002 .

[10]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[11]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[12]  Gerhard Wagenhals,et al.  Reducing CO2 Emissions , 1993 .

[13]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[14]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods , 2000 .

[15]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Future production and utilisation of biomass in Sweden: potentials and CO2 mitigation , 1997 .

[16]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Biofuels from stumps and small roundwood - Costs and CO2 benefits , 2008 .

[17]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 Mitigation: On Methods and Parameters for Comparison of Fossil-Fuel and Biofuel Systems , 2006 .

[18]  L. Lave,et al.  Environmental Implications of Alternative-Fueled Automobiles: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Tradeoffs , 2000 .

[19]  Staffan Berg,et al.  Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden , 2005 .

[20]  R. C. Gupta,et al.  WOODCHAR AS A SUSTAINABLE REDUCTANT FOR IRONMAKING IN THE 21ST CENTURY , 2003 .

[21]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies , 2003 .

[22]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Technology Dynamics and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation: A Cost Assessment , 2000 .

[23]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Towards a Standard Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems in Comparison with Fossil Energy Systems , 1997 .

[24]  Eric Croiset,et al.  High-Yield Biomass Charcoal† , 1996 .

[25]  R. Madlener,et al.  The Role of Wood Material for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation , 2006 .

[26]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Global bioenergy potentials through 2050 , 2001 .

[27]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation cost: A System Perspective on the Heating of Detached Houses , 2002 .

[28]  E. Robert,et al.  Optimizing the Greenhouse-Gas Benefits of Bioenergy Systems , 2006 .

[29]  Peter Hagström,et al.  Biomass potential for heat, electricity and vehicle fuel in Sweden , 2006 .