Dynamic patient grouping and prioritization: a new approach to emergency department flow improvement

The demand on emergency departments (ED) is variable and ever increasing, often leaving them overcrowded. Many hospitals are utilizing triage algorithms to rapidly sort and classify patients based on the severity of their injury or illness, however, most current triage methods are prone to over- or under-triage. In this paper, the group technology (GT) concept is applied to the triage process to develop a dynamic grouping and prioritization (DGP) algorithm. This algorithm identifies most appropriate patient groups and prioritizes them according to patient- and system-related information. Discrete event simulation (DES) has been implemented to investigate the impact of the DGP algorithm on the performance measures of the ED system. The impact was studied in comparison with the currently used triage algorithm, i.e., emergency severity index (ESI). The DGP algorithm outperforms the ESI algorithm by shortening patients’ average length of stay (LOS), average time to bed (TTB), time in emergency room, and lowering the percentage of tardy patients and their associated risk in the system.

[1]  S. P. Mitrofanov.  SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY , 1961 .

[2]  T. J. Greene,et al.  A review of cellular manufacturing assumptions, advantages and design techniques , 1984 .

[3]  D. Buesching,et al.  Inappropriate emergency department visits. , 1985, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  P. Benner,et al.  Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. , 1987, The American journal of nursing.

[5]  O. Felix Offodile.  Application of similarity coefficient method to parts coding and classification analysis in group technology , 1991 .

[6]  Robert Barclay Fetter,et al.  DRGs : their design and development , 1991 .

[7]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  Production flow analysis for planning group technology , 1991 .

[8]  J. J. Guterman,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of a computer-based decision support system for emergency department triage , 1993, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Societ.

[9]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems , 1994 .

[10]  Hugh Sanderson,et al.  The development of patient groupings for more effective management of health care , 1997 .

[11]  R. Beveridge,et al.  CAEP issues. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: a new and critical element in health care reform. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. , 1998, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  Valerie G. A. Grossman,et al.  Quick reference to triage , 1999 .

[13]  S. Walter,et al.  Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Information analysis in a distributed dynamic group technology method , 1999 .

[15]  Anita Lee-Post,et al.  Part family identification using a simple genetic algorithm , 2000 .

[16]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[17]  P G Zimmermann,et al.  The case for a universal, valid, reliable 5-tier triage acuity scale for US emergency departments. , 2001, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[18]  T. Warren Liao,et al.  Classification and coding approaches to part family formation under a fuzzy environment , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  L. Richardson,et al.  America's Health Care Safety Net: intact or unraveling? , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[20]  L. Richardson,et al.  Access to care: a review of the emergency medicine literature. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[21]  Monitoring the safety net: data challenges for emergency departments. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[22]  K. Cone,et al.  Characteristics, insights, decision making, and preparation of ED triage nurses. , 2002, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[23]  Carol Conroy,et al.  Rapid process redesign in a university-based emergency department: decreasing waiting time intervals and improving patient satisfaction. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[24]  S. Mahapatra,et al.  Pairing emergency severity index5-level triage data with computer aided system design to improve emergency department access and throughput , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[25]  D. Eitel,et al.  The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[26]  Karin V Rhodes,et al.  A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[27]  R. Cooper.  Emergency department triage: why we need a research agenda. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[28]  Frada Burstein,et al.  Mobile decision support for triage in emergency departments , 2004 .

[29]  Paula Tanabe,et al.  The Emergency Severity Index (version 3) 5-level triage system scores predict ED resource consumption. , 2004, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[30]  Exercises in critical thinking at triage: prioritizing patients with similar acuities. , 2004, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[31]  Julie Considine,et al.  The Australasian Triage Scale: examining emergency department nurses' performance using computer and paper scenarios. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[32]  D. Travers,et al.  Refining Emergency Severity Index triage criteria. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[33]  Leonid Churilov,et al.  Knowledge Discovery through Mining Emergency Department Data , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  P. Harper,et al.  A review and comparison of classification algorithms for medical decision making. , 2005, Health policy.

[35]  Leonid Churilov,et al.  A Mobile Emergency Triage Decision Support System Evaluation , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[36]  Anna Ehrenberg,et al.  Emergency department triage: is there a link between nurses' personal characteristics and accuracy in triage decisions? , 2006, Accident and emergency nursing.

[37]  Lei Li,et al.  Using classification trees to assess low birth weight outcomes , 2006, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[38]  A. Andersson,et al.  Triage in the emergency department--a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. , 2006, Nursing in critical care.

[39]  D. Aronsky,et al.  Measuring and forecasting emergency department crowding in real time. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[40]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Thinking strategies used by Registered Nurses during emergency department triage. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[41]  Jordan S. Peck.  Securing the Safety Net: Applying Manufacturing Systems Methods Towards Understanding and Redesigning a Hospital Emergency Department , 2008 .

[42]  D. Aronsky,et al.  Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[43]  Vimla L Patel,et al.  Calibrating urgency: triage decision-making in a pediatric emergency department , 2008, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[44]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  Triage Decision Making: Discrepancies in assigning the Emergency Severity Index , 2009 .

[45]  Serhan Ziya,et al.  Priority Assignment Under Imperfect Information on Customer Type Identities , 2009, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[46]  Steven L Bernstein,et al.  The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[47]  Peter H. Millard,et al.  Length of Stay-Based Clustering Methods for Patient Grouping , 2009 .

[48]  Shahram Lotfipour,et al.  Crowding and Delivery of Healthcare in Emergency Departments: The European Perspective , 2022 .

[49]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  Fuzzy AHP and utility theory based patient sorting in emergency departments , 2010 .

[50]  Gerard FitzGerald,et al.  Emergency department triage revisited , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[51]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  Patient Sorting Through Emergency Severity Index and Descriptive Variables’ Utility , 2010 .

[52]  David Claudio,et al.  Utility function-based patient prioritisation in the emergency department , 2010 .

[53]  J. Castner.  Emergency Department triage: what data are nurses collecting? , 2011, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[54]  Pranab K. Dan,et al.  Coding and Classification Based Heuristic Technique for Workpiece Grouping Problems in Cellular Manufacturing System , 2011 .

[55]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Exploration of group technology applications: Triage in the emergency department , 2012 .

[56]  Omar Ashour.  Patient Family Identification through Group Technology and Its Impact on Static Complexity and System Performance in the Emergency Department , 2012 .

[57]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A simulation analysis of the impact of FAHP-MAUT triage algorithm on the Emergency Department performance measures , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..