Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars.

Bell's theorem states that some predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be reproduced by a local-realist theory. That conflict is expressed by Bell's inequality, which is usually derived under the assumption that there are no statistical correlations between the choices of measurement settings and anything else that can causally affect the measurement outcomes. In previous experiments, this "freedom of choice" was addressed by ensuring that selection of measurement settings via conventional "quantum random number generators" was spacelike separated from the entangled particle creation. This, however, left open the possibility that an unknown cause affected both the setting choices and measurement outcomes as recently as mere microseconds before each experimental trial. Here we report on a new experimental test of Bell's inequality that, for the first time, uses distant astronomical sources as "cosmic setting generators." In our tests with polarization-entangled photons, measurement settings were chosen using real-time observations of Milky Way stars while simultaneously ensuring locality. Assuming fair sampling for all detected photons, and that each stellar photon's color was set at emission, we observe statistically significant ≳7.31σ and ≳11.93σ violations of Bell's inequality with estimated p values of ≲1.8×10^{-13} and ≲4.0×10^{-33}, respectively, thereby pushing back by ∼600  years the most recent time by which any local-realist influences could have engineered the observed Bell violation.

[1]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[2]  Le Phuc Thinh,et al.  Min-entropy sources for Bell tests , 2014 .

[3]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection , 2001, Nature.

[4]  Grey Giddins Statistics , 2016, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume.

[5]  Michael J. W. Hall,et al.  The Significance of Measurement Independence for Bell Inequalities and Locality , 2015, 1511.00729.

[6]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[7]  Adrian Kent,et al.  No signaling and quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[8]  Dax Enshan Koh,et al.  Effects of reduced measurement independence on Bell-based randomness expansion. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[9]  F. V. Leeuwen Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction , 2007, 0708.1752.

[10]  E. Knill,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[11]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[12]  Taehyun Kim,et al.  Phase-stable source of polarization-entangled photons using a polarization Sagnac interferometer , 2006, 2006 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2006 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[13]  Ulrich Bastian,et al.  The Hipparcos catalogue , 2009 .

[14]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[15]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum nonlocality as an axiom , 1994 .

[16]  Jason Gallicchio,et al.  Testing Bell's inequality with cosmic photons: closing the setting-independence loophole. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[17]  O. C. D. Beauregard S-matrix, Feynman zigzag and Einstein correlation , 1978 .

[18]  Marissa Giustina,et al.  Requirements for a loophole-free photonic Bell test using imperfect setting generators , 2014, 1411.4787.

[19]  Rupert Ursin,et al.  Feasibility of 300 km quantum key distribution with entangled states , 2009, 1007.4645.

[20]  Caslav Brukner,et al.  Experimenter's freedom in Bell's theorem and quantum cryptography (7 pages) , 2005, quant-ph/0510167.

[21]  D. Kaiser,et al.  Inflationary Cosmology: Exploring the Universe from the Smallest to the Largest Scales , 2005, Science.

[22]  N. Gisin,et al.  Measurement dependent locality , 2015, 1510.09087.

[23]  N. Gisin,et al.  Demonstration of Quantum Nonlocality in the Presence of Measurement Dependence. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[24]  D. Matsukevich,et al.  Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  Jan-AAke Larsson,et al.  Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism , 2014, 1407.0363.

[26]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.

[27]  Andrei Linde,et al.  A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon , 1982 .

[28]  Matison,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1972 .

[29]  Marissa Giustina,et al.  Bell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole , 2013, 1309.0712.

[30]  P. Pearle Hidden-Variable Example Based upon Data Rejection , 1970 .

[31]  J. Bell,et al.  The Theory of Local Beables , 1975 .

[32]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Heralded Entanglement Between Widely Separated Atoms , 2012, Science.

[33]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[34]  Thomas Jennewein,et al.  A wavelength-tunable fiber-coupled source of narrowband entangled photons. , 2007, Optics express.

[35]  Peter Bierhorst,et al.  A robust mathematical model for a loophole-free Clauser–Horne experiment , 2015 .

[36]  Andreas Albrecht,et al.  Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking , 1982 .

[37]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[38]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits , 2009, Nature.

[39]  David I. Kaiser,et al.  Inflationary paradigm after Planck 2013 , 2013, 1312.7619.

[40]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[41]  W. Hoeffding Probability Inequalities for sums of Bounded Random Variables , 1963 .

[42]  Manik Banik,et al.  Optimal free will on one side in reproducing the singlet correlation , 2012, 1204.3835.

[43]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[44]  Edward L. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Correcting for the Effects of Interstellar Extinction , 1998, astro-ph/9809387.

[45]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Tests of Bell inequalities , 2001, quant-ph/0107057.

[46]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption , 2012, Nature.

[47]  Rodrigo Gallego,et al.  Full randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events , 2012, Nature Communications.

[48]  S. Wehner,et al.  Bell Nonlocality , 2013, 1303.2849.

[49]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem , 2009, Nature.

[50]  N. Gisin,et al.  How much measurement independence is needed to demonstrate nonlocality? , 2010, Physical review letters.

[51]  V. Jonker,et al.  TH' , 2019, Dictionary of Upriver Halkomelem.

[52]  D. Kaiser,et al.  The Shared Causal Pasts and Futures of Cosmological Events , 2013, 1305.3943.

[53]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  Free randomness can be amplified , 2011, Nature Physics.

[54]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  (Nearly) optimal P values for all Bell inequalities , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[55]  M. Hall,et al.  Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems , 2011, 1102.4467.

[56]  A. Guth Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems , 1981 .

[57]  J. Mathis,et al.  The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction , 1989 .

[58]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[59]  Douglas P. Finkbeiner,et al.  MEASURING REDDENING WITH SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STELLAR SPECTRA AND RECALIBRATING SFD , 2010, 1012.4804.

[60]  Huw Price,et al.  Disentangling the Quantum World , 2015, Entropy.

[61]  Umesh Vazirani,et al.  Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. , 2012, 1210.1810.

[62]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[63]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks , 2009, 0903.4460.

[64]  Richard D. Gill,et al.  Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem , 2012, 1207.5103.

[65]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Richard D. Gill Time, Finite Statistics, and Bell's Fifth Position , 2003 .

[67]  C. Fröhlich,et al.  New determination of Rayleigh scattering in the terrestrial atmosphere. , 1980, Applied optics.

[68]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Random 'choices' and the locality loophole , 2015, 1510.00248.

[69]  M. Pshirkov,et al.  Weak microlensing effect and stability of pulsar time scale , 2006, astro-ph/0610681.

[70]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  Quantum non-locality and relativity , 1994 .

[71]  D. H. Rank,et al.  The Index of Refraction of Air , 1959 .

[72]  M. Hall Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[73]  C. Brans Bell's theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables , 1988 .

[74]  Rupert Ursin,et al.  Violation of local realism with freedom of choice , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.