The distribution and clearance of (2S,6S)-hydroxynorketamine, an active ketamine metabolite, in Wistar rats

The distribution, clearance, and bioavailability of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine has been studied in the Wistar rat. The plasma and brain tissue concentrations over time of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine were determined after intravenous (20 mg/kg) and oral (20 mg/kg) administration of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine (n = 3). After intravenous administration, the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis and the half‐life of drug elimination during the terminal phase (t1/2) was 8.0 ± 4.0 h and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 7352 ± 736 mL/kg, clearance (Cl) was 704 ± 139 mL/h per kg, and the bioavailability was 46.3%. Significant concentrations of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine were measured in brain tissues at 10 min after intravenous administration, ~30 μg/mL per g tissue which decreased to 6 μg/mL per g tissue at 60 min. The plasma and brain concentrations of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine were also determined after the intravenous administration of (S)‐ketamine, where significant plasma and brain tissue concentrations of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine were observed 10 min after administration. The (S)‐ketamine metabolites (S)‐norketamine, (S)‐dehydronorketamine, (2S,6R)‐hydroxynorketamine, (2S,5S)‐hydroxynorketamine and (2S,4S)‐hydroxynorketamine were also detected in both plasma and brain tissue. The enantioselectivity of the conversion of (S)‐ketamine and (R)‐ketamine to the respective (2,6)‐hydroxynorketamine metabolites was also investigated over the first 60 min after intravenous administration. (S)‐Ketamine produced significantly greater plasma and brain tissue concentrations of (2S,6S)‐hydroxynorketamine relative to the (2R,6R)‐hydroxynorketamine observed after the administration of (R)‐ketamine. However, the relative brain tissue: plasma concentrations of the enantiomeric (2,6)‐hydroxynorketamine metabolites were not significantly different indicating that the penetration of the metabolite is not enantioselective.

[1]  M. Bernier,et al.  (R,S)-Ketamine Metabolites (R,S)-norketamine and (2S,6S)-hydroxynorketamine Increase the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Function , 2014, Anesthesiology.

[2]  K. Hashimoto,et al.  R (−)-ketamine shows greater potency and longer lasting antidepressant effects than S (+)-ketamine , 2014, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[3]  M. Bernier,et al.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists alter the function and expression of serine racemase in PC-12 and 1321N1 cells. , 2013, Cellular signalling.

[4]  Maura L. Furey,et al.  Human Biomarkers of Rapid Antidepressant Effects , 2013, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  R. Duman,et al.  Activation of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin and Synaptogenesis: Role in the Actions of Rapid-Acting Antidepressants , 2013, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  J. Billard,et al.  Neuronal d-Serine and Glycine Release Via the Asc-1 Transporter Regulates NMDA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Activity , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Zarate,et al.  Sub-anesthetic concentrations of (R,S)-ketamine metabolites inhibit acetylcholine-evoked currents in α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. , 2013, European journal of pharmacology.

[8]  M. Torjman,et al.  Stereoselective and regiospecific hydroxylation of ketamine and norketamine , 2012, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[9]  G. Laje,et al.  Relationship of Ketamine's Plasma Metabolites with Response, Diagnosis, and Side Effects in Major Depression , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  D. Luckenbaugh,et al.  Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic modelling of ketamine and three major metabolites in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression. , 2012, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[11]  K. Hirota,et al.  Ketamine: new uses for an old drug? , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  L. Iyer,et al.  A parallel chiral-achiral liquid chromatographic method for the determination of the stereoisomers of ketamine and ketamine metabolites in the plasma and urine of patients with complex regional pain syndrome. , 2010, Talanta.

[13]  Nanxin Li,et al.  mTOR-Dependent Synapse Formation Underlies the Rapid Antidepressant Effects of NMDA Antagonists , 2010, Science.

[14]  R. Braithwaite,et al.  Use of Human Microsomes and Deuterated Substrates: An Alternative Approach for the Identification of Novel Metabolites of Ketamine by Mass Spectrometry , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[15]  H. Möller,et al.  Comparison of racemic ketamine and S-ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: Report of two cases , 2009, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[17]  G. Gudi,et al.  Effects of protein calorie malnutrition on the pharmacokinetics of ketamine in rats. , 2004, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[18]  R. Boulieu,et al.  HPLC determination of ketamine, norketamine, and dehydronorketamine in plasma with a high-purity reversed-phase sorbent. , 1998, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  P. Skolnick,et al.  Functional antagonists at the NMDA receptor complex exhibit antidepressant actions. , 1990, European journal of pharmacology.

[20]  T. Baillie,et al.  Comparative pharmacology in the rat of ketamine and its two principal metabolites, norketamine and (Z)-6-hydroxynorketamine. , 1986, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  M. Cohen,et al.  Distribution in the Brain and Metabolism of Ketamine in the Rat after Intravenous Administration , 1973, Anesthesiology.