Kanji's Business Scorecard

The Balanced Scorecard was first devised by Kaplan and Norton (1992, Harvard Business Review , January-February, pp. 71-79) as a measurement framework that was expected to overcome some of the deficiencies of traditional performance systems. It gives a holistic view of the organization by simultaneously looking at four important perspectives (financial, customer, internal processes, innovation and learning). Apart from being a measurement framework, the Balanced Scorecard achieved recognition as a strategic management system. The new approach to performance measurement suggested in the Balanced Scorecard is consistent with the initiatives under way in many companies: cross-functional integration, continuous improvement, customer-supplier partnerships and team rather than individual accountability. In this sense, it fits well into the quality management philosophy, embracing some of the business excellence principles of Kanji's Business Excellence Model. Nevertheless, the Balanced Scorecard, as presented by Kaplan and Norton, is not without limitations. The causality links suggested among the four perspectives are particularly problematic and ambiguous. Additionally, it fails to recognize explicitly the contributions of important stakeholders, such as employees and suppliers. Taking into account the potentialities and limitations of the traditional Balanced Scorecard, we propose the development of a new framework integrating the elements of Kanji's Business Excellence Model and taking advantage of the strengths of its sound methodological support. The Business Scorecard may be improved by integrating the total quality management principles and critical success factors that constitute Kanji's Business Excellence Model. The Kanji's Business Scorecard we present in this paper is not only a conceptual model, but also a measurement model. Furthermore, Kanji's approach has the potential to give a deeper understanding of how achievements in the different areas feed each other to form a cycle of continuous improvement. Finally, the implementation of Kanji's Business Scorecard can help organizations to develop, cascade and implement a strategy for business excellence.

[1]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Kenton B. Walker,et al.  Corporate performance reporting revisited ‐ the balanced scorecard and dynamic management reporting , 1996 .

[3]  S. F. Lee,et al.  e-Enterprise and management course development using strategy formulation framework for vocational education , 2003 .

[4]  S. F. Lee,et al.  Strategy formulation framework for vocational education: integrating SWOT analysis, balanced scorecard, QFD methodology and MBNQA education criteria , 2000 .

[5]  Albert H. C. Tsang,et al.  A strategic approach to managing maintenance performance , 1998 .

[6]  Matthew Hinton,et al.  A vehicle for change?: A case study of performance improvement in the “new” public sector , 1999 .

[7]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  The evolution of management accounting , 1984 .

[8]  Barbara Austin,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[9]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Measurement of business excellence , 1998 .

[10]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy , 1996 .

[11]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[12]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Measuring leadership excellence , 2001 .

[13]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[14]  Scott D. Johnson.  Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators: Application of the balanced scorecard approach , 1998 .

[15]  Marc J. Epstein,et al.  Implementing corporate strategy:: From Tableaux de Bord to balanced scorecards , 1998 .

[16]  Didier P. Hostettler,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: a Necessary Good or an Unnecessary Evil , 1999 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[18]  P. Hepworth,et al.  Weighing it up ‐ a literature review for the balanced scorecard , 1998 .

[19]  Steve Letza,et al.  Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy , 1997 .

[20]  Stephen R. Letza,et al.  The design and implementation of the balanced business scorecard , 1996 .

[21]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[22]  Anne Nagel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard Translating Strategy Into Action , 2002 .