Cardiac biomarker measurement currently addresses two key questions in patient management: the differential diagnosis of chest pain and the differential diagnosis of the patient with breathlessness. There are currently three major themes in the strategies for the differential diagnosis of chest pain. The first is to undertake troponin measurement in patients selected to be at lower risk, hence to have a low prior probability of disease. The second is the introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs cTn) assays into routine clinical use with measurement at 0 and 3 h from admission. Two other approaches that utilize the diagnostic characteristics of these assays have also been suggested. The first is to use the limit of detection or limit of blank of the assay as the diagnostic discriminant. The second approach is to use the low imprecision of the assay within the reference interval and combine a discriminant value with an absolute rate of change (delta value). The third is the use of additional biomarkers to allow early discharge from the emergency department. The concept is to measure high-sensitivity cardiac troponin plus the extra marker on admission. The role of measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide or its N-terminal prohormone, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, has been accepted and incorporated into guidelines for chronic heart failure for some time. More recently, guidelines for acute heart failure can also recommend a single measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in people presenting with new suspected acute heart failure.
[1]
C. Schindler,et al.
One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.
,
2012,
Archives of internal medicine.
[2]
Cynthia Balion,et al.
B-type natriuretic peptide-guided therapy: a systematic review
,
2014,
Heart Failure Reviews.
[3]
Joanna Young,et al.
A 2-hour diagnostic protocol for possible cardiac chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial.
,
2014,
JAMA internal medicine.
[4]
P. Collinson,et al.
High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study
,
2015,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[5]
M. Sebbane,et al.
Comparison of conventional and high-sensitivity troponin in patients with chest pain: a collaborative meta-analysis.
,
2015,
American heart journal.