Serum Neprilysin and Recurrent Admissions in Patients With Heart Failure

Background Our aim was to evaluate the association between the soluble form of neprilysin (sNEP) levels and long‐term all‐cause, cardiovascular, and acute heart failure (AHF) recurrent admissions in an ambulatory cohort of patients with heart failure. sNEP has emerged as a new biomarker with promising implications for prognosis and therapy in patients with heart failure. Reducing the recurrent admission rate of heart failure patients has become an important target of public health planning strategies. Methods and Results We measured sNEP levels in 1021 consecutive ambulatory heart failure patients. End points were the number of all‐cause, cardiovascular, and AHF hospitalizations during follow‐up. We used covariate‐adjusted incidence rate ratios to identify associations. At a median follow‐up of 3.4 years (interquartile range: 1.8–5.7), 391 (38.3%) patients died, 477 (46.7%) patients had 1901 all‐cause admissions, 324 (31.7%) patients had 770 cardiovascular admissions, and 218 (21.4%) patients had 488 AHF admissions. The medians for sNEP and amino‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide were 0.64 ng/mL (interquartile range: 0.39–1.22) and 1248 pg/mL (interquartile range: 538–2825), respectively. In a multivariate setting, the adjusted incidence rate ratios for the top (>1.22 ng/mL) versus the bottom (≤0.39 ng/mL) quartiles of sNEP were 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.82), P=0.032; 1.51 (95% confidence interval: 1.10–2.06), P=0.010; and 1.51 (95% confidence interval: 1.05–2.16), P=0.026 for all‐cause, cardiovascular, and AHF admissions, respectively. Conclusions Elevated sNEP levels predicted an increased risk of recurrent all‐cause, cardiovascular, and AHF admissions in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

[1]  Li Liang,et al.  Prediction of 30-Day All-Cause Readmissions in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Comparison of Machine Learning and Other Statistical Approaches , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[2]  S. Morell,et al.  Carbohydrate Antigen-125-Guided Therapy in Acute Heart Failure: CHANCE-HF: A Randomized Study. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[3]  M. de Antonio,et al.  Multi-Biomarker Profiling and Recurrent Hospitalizations in Heart Failure , 2016, Front. Cardiovasc. Med..

[4]  J. Lupón,et al.  Serum neprilysin and recurrent hospitalizations after acute heart failure. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  A Test in Context: Neprilysin: Function, Inhibition, and Biomarker. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Hardin,et al.  Regression Models for Bivariate Count Outcomes , 2016 .

[7]  J. Lupón,et al.  Soluble neprilysin does not correlate with outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? , 2016, European journal of heart failure.

[8]  E. Núñez,et al.  Espironolactona en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca y fracción de eyección preservada , 2016 .

[9]  M. Domingo,et al.  Estrategia multimarcador para estratificar el pronóstico en insuficiencia cardiaca. Valor de los marcadores neurohumorales: neprilisina frente a NT-proBNP , 2015 .

[10]  M. de Antonio,et al.  Multimarker Strategy for Heart Failure Prognostication. Value of Neurohormonal Biomarkers: Neprilysin vs NT-proBNP. , 2015, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[11]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  The 30‐day metric in acute heart failure revisited: data from IN‐HF Outcome, an Italian nationwide cardiology registry , 2015, European journal of heart failure.

[12]  J. Lupón,et al.  Prognostic Value and Kinetics of Soluble Neprilysin in Acute Heart Failure: A Pilot Study. , 2015, JACC. Heart failure.

[13]  F. Formiga,et al.  Spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. , 2015, Revista clinica espanola.

[14]  M. de Antonio,et al.  Soluble neprilysin is predictive of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in heart failure patients. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Compared With Enalapril on the Risk of Clinical Progression in Surviving Patients With Heart Failure , 2015, Circulation.

[16]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Pocock,et al.  Effect of rosuvastatin on repeat heart failure hospitalizations: the CORONA Trial (Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure). , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.

[18]  S. Solomon,et al.  Analysing recurrent hospitalizations in heart failure: a review of statistical methodology, with application to CHARM‐Preserved , 2014, European journal of heart failure.

[19]  J. McMurray,et al.  Time to move on from 'time-to-first': should all events be included in the analysis of clinical trials? , 2012, European heart journal.

[20]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Rehospitalization for heart failure: predict or prevent? , 2012, Circulation.

[21]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Statistical models and patient predictors of readmission for heart failure: a systematic review. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Multivariable Model-Building: A Pragmatic Approach to Regression Analysis based on Fractional Polynomials for Modelling Continuous Variables , 2008 .

[23]  E. G. Erdös,et al.  Neutral endopeptidase in serum samples from patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Comparison with angiotensin-converting enzyme. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.