Evaluation of quantitative image analysis criteria for the high-resolution microendoscopic detection of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Early detection of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus is essential to improve outcomes. The aim of this ex vivo study was to evaluate the ability of high-resolution microendoscopic imaging and quantitative image analysis to identify neoplastic lesions in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Nine patients with pathologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus underwent endoscopic examination with biopsies or endoscopic mucosal resection. Resected fresh tissue was imaged with fiber bundle microendoscopy; images were analyzed by visual interpretation or by quantitative image analysis to predict whether the imaged sites were non-neoplastic or neoplastic. The best performing pair of quantitative features were chosen based on their ability to correctly classify the data into the two groups. Predictions were compared to the gold standard of histopathology. Subjective analysis of the images by expert clinicians achieved average sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 61%, respectively. The best performing quantitative classification algorithm relied on two image textural features and achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 85%, respectively. This ex vivo pilot trial demonstrates that quantitative analysis of images obtained with a simple microendoscope system can distinguish neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with good sensitivity and specificity when compared to histopathology and to subjective image interpretation.

[1]  Jeffrey J Rodríguez,et al.  Computer-aided identification of ovarian cancer in confocal microendoscope images. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  Tasha A K Gandamihardja,et al.  Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Timothy J Muldoon,et al.  Subcellular-resolution molecular imaging within living tissue by fiber microendoscopy. , 2007, Optics express.

[4]  Martial Guillaud,et al.  Real-time reflectance confocal microscopy: comparison of two-dimensional images and three-dimensional image stacks for detection of cervical precancer. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  R. Kiesslich,et al.  Distinction of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma , 2006, Esophagus.

[6]  A. Axon,et al.  Interobserver Variation and Standardized Training for Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Image Interpretation in the Upper and Lower GI Tract , 2007 .

[7]  Timothy J Muldoon,et al.  High-resolution imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a novel, low-cost endoscopic microscope. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  T. Tkaczyk,et al.  Texture analysis of optical coherence tomography images: feasibility for tissue classification. , 2003, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  Kenneth K Wang,et al.  Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system , 2007, Gut.

[10]  Murray H Loew,et al.  Computer recognition of cancer in the urinary bladder using optical coherence tomography and texture analysis. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  G. Tytgat,et al.  Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma , 1998, Gut.

[12]  J. Hornick,et al.  Low prevalence of submucosal invasive carcinoma at esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a 20-year experience. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[13]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  Fast algorithms for texture analysis using co-occurrence matrices , 1990 .

[14]  R. Kiesslich,et al.  In vivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy. , 2005, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[15]  M. Vieth,et al.  Confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy for in vivo determination of microvessel density in Barrett’s esophagus , 2008, Endoscopy.

[16]  H. Welch,et al.  The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[18]  R. Kiesslich,et al.  Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[19]  Hervé Bourlard,et al.  Generalization and Parameter Estimation in Feedforward Netws: Some Experiments , 1989, NIPS.

[20]  Xiang-Jun Xie,et al.  Diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia with confocal laser endomicroscopy in vivo: a prospective study. , 2008, Endoscopy.

[21]  N. Shaheen,et al.  Does screening for Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus prolong survival? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  R. Cestari,et al.  Long-term endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus. incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma: a prospective study , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[23]  L. Gossner,et al.  Histological analysis of endoscopic resection specimens from 326 patients with Barrett's esophagus and early neoplasia. , 2004, Endoscopy.

[24]  Wouter L Curvers,et al.  Multimodality imaging in Barrett's esophagus: looking longer, seeing better, and recognizing more. , 2008, Gastroenterology.