A survey of the clinical use of telehealth in speech-language pathology across Australia

Research into the use of telehealth technology for speech-language pathology {SLP) services has been conducted for over 30 years; however, it is unknown whether this research has translated into clinical practice. A web-based survey was deployed to determine key factors around the clinical use of telehealth by Australian SLPs. Quantitative analysis revealed that clinicians are using a wide range of technology to deliver a variety of SLP services to both paediatric and adult populations. A number of benefits to using telehealth in clinical practice were identified, along with significant barriers to the expansion of telehealth in SLP. Suggested facilitators for the further development of telehealth in SLP included more professional development in the area of telehealth, demonstrations by experienced users of telehealth, and access to electronic assessment and treatment resources. Limitations of the study are discussed with directions for future research.

[1]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[2]  Stephen Wilson,et al.  Treating disordered speech and voice in Parkinson's disease online: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. , 2011, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[3]  D. Theodoros,et al.  Internet-based telehealth assessment of language using the CELF-4. , 2010, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[4]  L. McAllister,et al.  A comparison of rural speech-language pathologists' and residents' access to and attitudes towards the use of technology for speech-language pathology service delivery , 2010, International journal of speech-language pathology.

[5]  D. Theodoros,et al.  Assessment of children's literacy via an Internet-based telehealth system. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  Michael McCue,et al.  Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. , 2010, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[7]  Ann Packman,et al.  Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of a telehealth treatment for chronic stuttering: the Camperdown Program. , 2009, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[8]  Queensland. Annual Report 2009-10 Compliance Checklist , 2010 .

[9]  Michael T French,et al.  Economic evaluation of telemedicine: review of the literature and research guidelines for benefit-cost analysis. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  The redesign and re-evaluation of an internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of dysarthria in adults. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[11]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults. , 2009, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[12]  J. Vick,et al.  Telehealth applications in speech-language pathology: a modified narrative review , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  Deborah Theodoros,et al.  Assessment of communication and swallowing post-laryngectomy: a telerehabilitation trial , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  The effects of aphasia severity on the ability to assess language disorders via telerehabilitation , 2009 .

[15]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  R. Huebner,et al.  Videophone-delivered voice therapy: a comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson's disease. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  Victoria Styles Service users' acceptability of videoconferencing as a form of service delivery , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[18]  A. Packman,et al.  A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[19]  S. Leitão,et al.  Service delivery in rural, remote and regional speech pathology. Part 1: Current approaches; Part 2: The influence of context and philosophy , 2007 .

[20]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  An Internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders: a pilot study. , 2006, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[21]  R. Bashshur,et al.  Telemedicine effects: Cost, quality, and access , 1995, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  M. Onslow,et al.  Telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: five case studies. , 2004, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[23]  Annie J. Hill,et al.  Research into telehealth applications in speech-language pathology , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[24]  Sue Whetton,et al.  The diffusion of innovation: factors influencing the uptake of telehealth. , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.