Geostatistical modeling of the spatial distribution of soil dioxin in the vicinity of an incinerator. 2. Verification and calibration study.

A key component in any investigation of cause-effect relationships between point source pollution, such as an incinerator, and human health is the availability of measurements and/or accurate models of exposure at the same scale or geography as the health data. Geostatistics allows one to simulate the spatial distribution of pollutant concentrations over various spatial supports while incorporating both field data and predictions of deterministic dispersion models. This methodology was used in a companion paper to identify the census blocks that have a high probability of exceeding a given level of dioxin TEQ (toxic equivalents) around an incinerator in Midland, MI. This geostatistical model, along with population data, provided guidance for the collection of 51 new soil data, which permits the verification of the geostatistical predictions, and calibration of the model. Each new soil measurement was compared to the set of 100 TEQ values simulated at the closest grid node. The correlation between the measured concentration and the averaged simulated value is moderate (0.44), and the actual concentrations are clearly overestimated in the vicinity of the plant property line. Nevertheless, probability intervals computed from simulated TEQ values provide an accurate model of uncertainty: the proportion of observations that fall within these intervals exceeds what is expected from the model. Simulation-based probability intervals are also narrower than the intervals derived from the global histogram of the data, which demonstrates the greater precision of the geostatistical approach. Log-normal ordinary kriging provided fairly similar estimation results for the small and well-sampled area used in this validation study; however, the model of uncertainty was not always accurate. The regression analysis and geostatistical simulation were then conducted using the combined set of 53 original and 51 new soil samples, leading to an updated model for the spatial distribution of TEQ in Midland, MI.

[1]  P Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical assessment and validation of uncertainty for three-dimensional dioxin data from sediments in an estuarine river. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Yoon-Seok Chang,et al.  Influence of a municipal solid waste incinerator on ambient air and soil PCDD/Fs levels. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[3]  G. Jacquez,et al.  Visualization and exploratory analysis of epidemiologic data using a novel space time information system , 2004, International journal of health geographics.

[4]  K. Yoshida,et al.  Validation of modeling approach to evaluate congener-specific concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in air and soil near a solid waste incinerator. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[5]  J. Lepkowski,et al.  Geostatistical modeling of the spatial distribution of soil dioxins in the vicinity of an incinerator. 1. Theory and application to Midland, Michigan. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Selective remediation of contaminated sites using a two-level multiphase strategy and geostatistics. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  C. Koester,et al.  Wet and dry deposition of chlorinated dioxins and furans , 1992 .

[8]  Ronald A. Hites,et al.  Atmospheric transport and deposition of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans , 1989 .

[9]  C. Seigneur,et al.  Atmospheric fate and transport of dioxins: local impacts. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[10]  M. McLachlan,et al.  Measurement of atmospheric deposition of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) to a soil , 1997 .

[11]  Louis W. Chang,et al.  Approaching gas-particle partitioning equilibrium of atmospheric PCDD/Fs with increasing distance from an incinerator: measurements and observations on modeling , 2004 .

[12]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[13]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Accounting for measurement error in uncertainty modeling and decision‐making using indicator kriging and p‐field simulation: application to a dioxin contaminated site , 2002 .

[14]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Archontoula Chaloulakou,et al.  Classification criteria and probability risk maps: limitations and perspectives. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Frédéric Mauny,et al.  Dispersion modeling as a dioxin exposure indicator in the vicinity of a municipal solid waste incinerator: a validation study. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  K. Jones,et al.  Dioxins and furans in air and deposition: a review of levels, behaviour and processes. , 1998, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Matthew Lorber,et al.  Testing the USA EPA's ISCST-Version 3 model on dioxins: a comparison of predicted and observed air and soil concentrations , 2000 .