RadLex Terms and Local Texture Features for Multimodal Medical Case Retrieval

Clinicians searching through the large data sets of multimodal medical information generated in hospitals currently do not fully exploit previous medical cases to retrieve relevant information for a differential diagnosis. The VISCERAL Retrieval benchmark organized a medical case---based retrieval evaluation using a data set composed of patient scans and RadLex term anatomy---pathology lists from the radiologic reports. In this paper a retrieval method for medical cases that uses both textual and visual features is presented. It defines a weighting scheme that combines the RadLex terms anatomical and clinical correlations with the information from local texture features obtained from the region of interest in the query cases. The method implementation, with an innovative 3D Riesz wavelet texture analysis and an approach to generate a common spatial domaini¾?to compare medical images is described. The proposed method obtained overall competitive results in the VISCERAL Retrieval benchmark and could be seen as a tool to perform medical case based retrieval in large clinical data sets.

[1]  C. Langlotz RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Henning Müller,et al.  Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Medical Tasks , 2013, CLEF.

[3]  S Napel,et al.  Imaging Informatics: Toward Capturing and Processing Semantic Information in Radiology Images , 2010, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[4]  N. Ayache,et al.  Log‐Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Henning Müller,et al.  Epileptogenic Lesion Quantification in MRI Using Contralateral 3D Texture Comparisons , 2013, MICCAI.

[6]  Antoine Geissbühler,et al.  A Review of Content{Based Image Retrieval Systems in Medical Applications { Clinical Bene(cid:12)ts and Future Directions , 2022 .

[7]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Overview of the VISCERAL Retrieval Benchmark 2015 , 2015, MRDM@ECIR.

[8]  Antoine Geissbühler,et al.  Erratum to "A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications - Clinical benefits and future directions" [I. J. Medical Informatics 73 (1) (2004) 1-23] , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Henning Müller,et al.  Medical case-based retrieval: integrating query MeSH terms for query-adaptive multi-modal fusion , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  VISCERAL: Towards Large Data in Medical Imaging - Challenges and Directions , 2012, MCBR-CDS.

[12]  Pol Cirujeda,et al.  MCOV: A Covariance Descriptor for Fusion of Texture and Shape Features in 3D Point Clouds , 2014, 2014 2nd International Conference on 3D Vision.

[13]  Henning Müller,et al.  Texture classification of anatomical structures in CT using a context-free machine learning approach , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  On combining image-based and ontological semantic dissimilarities for medical image retrieval applications , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Bringing the Algorithms to the Data: Cloud-Based Benchmarking for Medical Image Analysis , 2012, CLEF.