Personas, people and participation: challenges from the trenches of local government

In the early days of digital technology development, design was done 'for', 'with' or 'by' the users based on the assumption that users were real people. Today 'users' have become a component in mass-market production and are seen as 'customers', rather than people. Still designers need to address use, and personas have been introduced for this purpose. The paper uses research on user participation and research-based personas from the eGov+ project to discuss whether personas help designers engage with users. In this project, design was carried out in the domain of municipal services through involvement of clerks, management and citizens from three different municipalities. Through four cases we discuss if applying personas in participatory design settings is productive to designers' understanding of users' use situations. Does deployment of personas bring designers closer to the actual use situation? In which ways do personas help design for, with or by the users? Do personas support participatory design?

[1]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[2]  Ulrich Briefs,et al.  Systems design for, with, and by the users : proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.1 Working Conference on Systems Design for, with, and by the Users, Riva del Sole, Italy, 20-24 September 1982 , 1983 .

[3]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Timeline collaboration , 2010, CHI.

[4]  Ellen Tove Christiansen,et al.  A conceptual toolbox for designing CSCW applications , 1994 .

[5]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  "You Probably Shouldn't Give them Too Much Information" - Supporting Citizen-Government Collaboration , 2011, ECSCW.

[6]  S. Bødker,et al.  Scenarios as Springboards in Design , 1993 .

[7]  Alistair Sutcliff,et al.  Designing interactive systems , 1996, SGCH.

[8]  Kristen Nygaard,et al.  Program development as a social activity , 1990 .

[9]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Designing for ephemerality and prototypicality , 2004, DIS '04.

[10]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Inspiration card workshops , 2006, DIS '06.

[11]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[12]  Erin Friess,et al.  Personas and decision making in the design process: an ethnographic case study , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology , 2011, C&T.

[14]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Personas: from theory to practices , 2008, NordiCHI.

[15]  John S. Pruitt,et al.  The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design , 2006 .

[16]  Preben Holst Mogensen,et al.  Using Artifacts as Triggers for Participatory Analysis , 1992 .

[17]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations , 1990 .

[18]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  The Boundaries of Participatory Citizenship , 2009, ECSCW.

[19]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[20]  Susanne Bødker.  Prototyping Revisited: - design with users in a cooperative setting , 1987 .

[21]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? , 2012, CHI.

[22]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Artifacts in design: representation, ideation, and process , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.