Interaction-based virtual power plant operation methodology for distribution system operator’s voltage management

The importance of distribution system operator (DSO) continues to increase owing to the widespread use of distributed energy resources (DERs) in power distribution system. A virtual power plant (VPP) that mostly relies on small DERs tends to make operations more difficult for DSO, because the VPP attempts to maximize its profits regardless of the status of the corresponding distribution system if an appropriate cooperation mechanism is not present. In this study, an interaction-based VPP operation methodology using distribution system constraints (DSCs) is proposed for DSO voltage management, assuming that the VPP primarily participates in the wholesale energy market (WEM). For efficient cooperative operations between a DSO and VPP, the VPP's DERs are grouped according to the DERs locations in distribution lines. Then, distributed system constraints that represent appropriate power outputs for the specific resource groups are calculated through the interactions between the DSO and the VPP. Both Volt-Watt control (VWC) and Volt-var control (VVC) are considered for optimal DSC calculation. The VWC and VVC-based operation results are compared to evaluate the technical and economic effects from both the DSO and VPP perspectives. The case study results show that the proposed methodology keeps the distribution system's voltage within the target range, reduces economic losses by approximately 24% compared to traditional methodologies, and reduces the DSC calculation rate of DSOs by approximately half. These results indicate that the proposed methodology could be effectively utilized in DSO and VPP operations.

[1]  Paul A. Trodden,et al.  Local Solutions of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Abdelghani Bekrar,et al.  Reactive Power Dispatch Optimization with Voltage Profile Improvement Using an Efficient Hybrid Algorithm , 2018, Energies.

[3]  P. Lokender Reddy,et al.  PSO based optimal reactive power dispatch for voltage profile improvement , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power, Communication and Information Technology Conference (PCITC).

[4]  Liwei Ju,et al.  A multi-objective robust scheduling model and solution algorithm for a novel virtual power plant connected with power-to-gas and gas storage tank considering uncertainty and demand response , 2019, Applied Energy.

[5]  Ali M. Eltamaly,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Using Particle Swarm Optimization of Renewable Hybrid Distributed Generation , 2017 .

[6]  Yang Li,et al.  Energy Management Strategy for a Society of Prosumers Under the IOT Environment Considering the Network Constraints , 2019, IEEE Access.

[7]  Rahmat-Allah Hooshmand,et al.  A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems , 2017 .

[8]  H. Hafezi,et al.  Reassessment of voltage variation for load power and energy demand management , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[9]  Niels Christian Nordentoft,et al.  FLECH: A Danish market solution for DSO congestion management through DER flexibility services , 2014 .

[10]  M. Carrion,et al.  A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Fainan Hassan,et al.  Power Quality Disturbances , 2011 .

[12]  C. Rydh,et al.  Energy analysis of batteries in photovoltaic systems. Part I: Performance and energy requirements , 2005 .

[13]  Martin Winter,et al.  Economic optimization in Virtual Power Plants vs. stable grid operation—bridging the gap , 2015, 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA).

[14]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Impact of Network Regulation on the Incentive for DG Integration for the DSO: Opportunities for a Transition Toward a Smart Grid , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Voltage Regulation Support Along a Distribution Line by a Virtual Power Plant Based on a Center of Mass Load Modeling , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[16]  M. A. Abido,et al.  Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization , 2002 .

[17]  Yichi Zhang,et al.  An Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Guiding Strategy and Its Application in Reactive Power Optimization , 2019, Energies.

[18]  Valentin Robu,et al.  Optimization of a multiple-scale renewable energy-based virtual power plant in the UK , 2019, Applied Energy.

[19]  Rahmat-Allah Hooshmand,et al.  Market based transmission expansion and reactive power planning with consideration of wind and load uncertainties , 2014 .

[20]  Samia Nefti-Meziani,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Swarm Optimization Algorithms , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Shi You,et al.  Coordinated Charging of Electric Vehicles for Congestion Prevention in the Distribution Grid , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[22]  Deqian Kong,et al.  Bi-level multi-time scale scheduling method based on bidding for multi-operator virtual power plant , 2019, Applied Energy.

[23]  Abdullah M. Shaheen,et al.  A review of meta-heuristic algorithms for reactive power planning problem , 2015, Ain Shams Engineering Journal.

[24]  Juan de Santiago,et al.  Reactive Power Control for LV Distribution Networks Voltage Management , 2018, 2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe).

[25]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Dynamic Power Tariff for Congestion Management in Distribution Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[26]  Kai Strunz,et al.  Wind and Solar Power Integration in Electricity Markets and Distribution Networks Through Service-Centric Virtual Power Plants , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Renke Huang,et al.  Coordinative real‐time sub‐transmission volt–var control for reactive power regulation between transmission and distribution systems , 2018, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[28]  Rahmat-Allah Hooshmand,et al.  Event-based scheduling of industrial technical virtual power plant considering wind and market prices stochastic behaviors - A case study in Iran , 2018 .

[29]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Price-based unit commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[30]  M. Armand,et al.  Building better batteries , 2008, Nature.