Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: a reanalysis.

C. L. Gagne and E. J. Shoben (1997) proposed that concepts are combined via external relations and that lexical entries include information about which relations are frequent for every modifying noun. As evidence for this view, they showed that relations associated with the modifier affected the interpretation of combinations in several studies in which subjects had to decide whether the combinations were sensible. The authors evaluated the methods and stimuli used in Gagne and Shoben's experiments and present findings suggesting that the effect of relation frequency is likely due to differences between the familiarity and plausibility of different combinations. Although relation frequency could be involved in conceptual combination, the authors concluded that better evidence is needed for this variable, controlling for other more general differences between the combinations.

[1]  J. Hampton Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language , 1970 .

[3]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Basing Categorization on Individuals and Events , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Judith N. Levi,et al.  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , 1978 .

[5]  Gert Storms,et al.  Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .

[7]  G. Murphy,et al.  What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[9]  Benjamin Cohen,et al.  Models of Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  E. Wisniewski When concepts combine , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  R. Nosofsky Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .

[13]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[14]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Interactive property attribution in concept combination , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. , 2000 .