Lateral resolution challenges for triangulation-based three-dimensional imaging systems

Lateral resolution is a particularly challenging concept to quantify in triangulation-based three-dimensional (3-D) imaging systems. We present these challenges, then describe an artifact-based methodology for evaluating the lateral resolution of a triangulation-based 3-D imaging system that uses laser spots or laser lines. In particular, the response of a 3-D imaging system to a spatial discontinuity (step edge) has traditionally been modeled as a first-order linear system. We model the response of a triangulation-based laser imaging system to a spatial step edge from first principles and demonstrate that the response should be modeled as a non linear system. This model is then used as a basis for evaluating the lateral (structural) resolution of a triangulation-based laser imaging system.

[1]  M. Rioux,et al.  Influence of speckle on laser range finders. , 1991, Applied optics.

[2]  M C Roggemann,et al.  Image-quality metrics for characterizing adaptive optics system performance. , 1997, Applied optics.

[3]  Francois Blais,et al.  Portable digital 3-D imaging system for remote sites , 1998, ISCAS '98. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.98CH36187).

[4]  Ignacio Lira,et al.  DESIGN NOTE: The evaluation of standard uncertainty in the presence of limited resolution of indicating devices , 1997 .

[5]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Accuracy of 3D range scanners by measurement of the slanted edge modulation transfer function , 2003, Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings..

[6]  P. Miller.  Applications of 3D Measurement from Images , 2009 .

[7]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Color Reflectance Modeling Using a Polychromatic Laser Range Sensor , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Francois Blais,et al.  Evaluating laser range scanner lateral resolution in 3D metrology , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Sabry F. El-Hakim,et al.  Practical range camera calibration , 1993, Other Conferences.

[10]  François Blais,et al.  Measurement quality metrics for rapid laser range scanning , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  M. Amann,et al.  Laser ranging: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement , 2001 .

[12]  Adriaan van den Bos,et al.  Resolution: a survey , 1997 .

[13]  T. Kersten,et al.  COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE ACCURACY BEHAVIOUR OF THE NEW GENERATION OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[14]  Gerd Haeusler,et al.  Physical limits of 3D sensing , 1993, Other Conferences.

[15]  G. Häusler,et al.  Three-dimensional sensing of rough surfaces by coherence radar. , 1992, Applied optics.

[16]  Alan M. Lytle,et al.  Status of the NIST 3D imaging system performance evaluation facility , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Francois Blais,et al.  Proposed traceable structural resolution protocols for 3D imaging systems , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[18]  Mumin Song,et al.  Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods , 2000 .

[19]  Dietmar Wüller,et al.  Noise reduction versus spatial resolution , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Stephen E. Reichenbach,et al.  Characterizing digital image acquisition devices , 1991 .

[21]  G. Häusler,et al.  Laser triangulation: fundamental uncertainty in distance measurement. , 1994, Applied optics.

[22]  M. Rioux,et al.  Real-time numerical peak detector , 1986 .

[23]  M Rioux,et al.  Centroid fluctuations of speckled targets. , 1991, Applied optics.