Does Product Platform Strategy Mediate the Effects of Supply Chain Integration on Performance? A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective

This study depicts supply chain integration (SCI) for new product development (NPD) as a dynamic capability and explores its relationship with a product platform strategy (PPS), NPD performance, and overall firm performance. Supplier, internal, and customer integration are modeled as antecedents to PPS, while product innovation and relative profitability are modeled as direct and/or indirect consequences. The model examines whether a PPS mediates the effects of SCI on performance. An analysis of 214 US manufacturers revealed that supplier integration and internal integration are positively related to PPS, and that their effects on product innovation and profitability are fully mediated by PPS. In contrast, customer integration had no effect on PPS and thus no indirect effect on performance measures. The research showed that PPS both directly and indirectly (though product innovation) affects profitability. The findings suggest the value of aligning the domains of integration and performance and considering the domain strategy when examining the effects of SCI on performance.

[1]  Baofeng Huo,et al.  The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration , 2011 .

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[3]  Cristina Giménez Thomsen,et al.  Logistics-Production, Logistics-Marketing and External Integration: Their Impact on Performance , 2003 .

[4]  F. Liu,et al.  Product development performance measures in manufacturing firm , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[5]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[6]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  Internal and External Integration for Product Development: The Contingency Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[7]  S. Vickery,et al.  Integration in global supply chains , 2011 .

[8]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[9]  M. Naim,et al.  Supply chain integration using a maturity scale , 2008 .

[10]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[11]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[12]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry , 2004 .

[13]  H. Bozdogan Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[14]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  TIMING AND EXTENT OF SUPPLIER INTEGRATION IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A CONTINGENCY APPROACH , 2008 .

[15]  M. Sawhney,et al.  The 12 different ways for companies to innovate , 2012, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  David Hall,et al.  Strategy follows structure , 1980 .

[17]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Logistics‐production, logistics‐marketing and external integration , 2013 .

[18]  Charles A. Holloway,et al.  How to integrate work and deepen expertise , 1994 .

[19]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Metrics for Managing Research and Development in the Context of the Product Family , 1997 .

[20]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[21]  P. Bentler MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS WITH LATENT VARIABLES: CAUSAL MODELING , 1980 .

[22]  H. Akaike Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[23]  N. Sanders,et al.  MODELING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM IT CAPABILITY, COLLABORATION, AND PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[24]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[25]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[26]  P. Daugherty,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION AND LOGISTICAL SERVICE PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[27]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Concurrent engineering and its consequences , 2001 .

[28]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms , 2002 .

[29]  Bülent Sezen,et al.  Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance , 2008 .

[30]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Supply chain interactions and time‐related performances: An operations management perspective , 2001 .

[31]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[32]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[33]  Theodore P. Stank,et al.  Performance Benefits of Supply Chain Logistical Integration , 2001 .

[34]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics , 2004 .

[35]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[36]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? , 1998 .

[37]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[38]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[40]  Nathalie Fabbe-Costes,et al.  Supply Chain Integration improves performance - The emperor’s new suit? , 2007 .

[41]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[42]  K. Clark,et al.  Lead time in automobile product development explaining the Japanese advantage , 1989 .

[43]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Competing through development capability in a manufacturing-based organization , 1992 .

[44]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  UPSTREAM SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY INDUSTRY , 2000 .

[45]  B. Bowonder,et al.  Innovation Strategies for Creating Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[46]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Regaining the Lead in Manufacturing: How to Integrate Work and Deepen Expertise , 1994 .

[47]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Multibranded Platform Development: A Corporate Strategy with Multimanagerial Challenges , 2007 .

[48]  武石 彰 Bridging inter-and intra-firm boundaries : management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 1998 .

[49]  P. Williamson,et al.  Is Your Innovation Process Global , 2004 .

[50]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[51]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships , 2011 .

[52]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Accelerating the Design‐build‐test Cycle for Effective Product Development , 1994 .

[53]  Junfeng Zhang,et al.  Product Development Strategy, Product Innovation Performance, and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Utilization: Evidence from Subsidiaries in China , 2009 .

[54]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  TQM across multiple countries: Convergence hypothesis versus national specificity arguments , 2005 .

[55]  T. Johnsen Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: Taking stock and looking to the future , 2009 .

[56]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[57]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[58]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[59]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Empirical examination of the underlying dimensions of strategic purchasing competence , 1998 .

[60]  P. Daugherty,et al.  Defining and operationalizing supply chain process integration , 2009 .

[61]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[62]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[63]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Power Influences in the Supply Chain , 2000 .

[64]  J. Hunter,et al.  On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria , 1987 .

[65]  R. Shah,et al.  In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects , 2009 .

[66]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[67]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[68]  T. Raykov Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures , 1997 .

[69]  Daniel F. Lynch,et al.  Linking Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in Integrated Logistics , 2004 .

[70]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance , 2004 .

[71]  G. Stock,et al.  Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: the role of fit , 2000 .

[72]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply‐chain linkages and operational performance: A resource‐based‐view perspective , 2003 .

[73]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Co-designing modes of cooperation at the customer interface: learning from exploratory research , 2005 .

[74]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  COMPETING THROUGH MANUFACTURING AND THE NEW MANUFACTURING PARADIGM: IS MANUFACTURING STRATEGY PASSE? , 1996 .

[75]  Nathalie Fabbe-Costes,et al.  Supply Chain Integration and Performance - A Review of the Evidence , 2008 .

[76]  Karthik N. S. Iyer,et al.  THE INTERACTION OF INTERNAL AND DOWNSTREAM INTEGRATION AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[77]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .