A theoretical framework for classifying occupant-centric data streams on indoor climate using a physiological and cognitive process hierarchy

Abstract New and pervasive information and communication technologies have made it possible to capture a large range of continuous data from, or close to, each individual building occupant. These occupant-centric data streams may include subjective votes, evaluations, complaints, control actions, physiological measurements such as heart rate or pupil size, physical measurements of skin temperature or local draft and air temperature measurements and much more. Currently, considerable resources are put into studies that focus on the development and potential uses of such systems, while the origin and nature of the collected information which is embedded in the data is poorly investigated. In this paper, we propose a taxonomy for the classification of occupant-centric data streams, developed through the application of established theories and categories in environmental and market psychology. The proposed framework organises five data source categories and links them to four levels of physiological and cognitive processes, making an explicit connection between data and embedded information attributes. The framework, originally developed to classify continuous occupant centric data in the domain of indoor climate, can also bring insights that might help explaining known gaps and challenges in different models and theories that aim at predicting individual satisfaction with indoor climate conditions.

[1]  Zoltán Nagy,et al.  Introducing IEA EBC annex 79: Key challenges and opportunities in the field of occupant-centric building design and operation , 2020, Building and Environment.

[2]  I. M. João,et al.  A Critical Review of Customer Satisfaction Measurement in Tourism Industry , 2006 .

[3]  Mateja Dovjak,et al.  Challenging the assumptions for thermal sensation scales , 2017 .

[4]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  SPOT: a smart personalized office thermal control system , 2013, e-Energy '13.

[5]  Gail Brager,et al.  Nudging the adaptive thermal comfort model , 2020 .

[6]  R. Oliver Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. , 1993 .

[7]  Alex Parkinson,et al.  Continuous IEQ monitoring system: Context and development , 2019, Building and Environment.

[8]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[9]  Ken Parsons,et al.  Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort and Performance , 1999 .

[10]  A Auliciems,et al.  Towards a psycho-physiological model of thermal perception , 1981, International journal of biometeorology.

[11]  Koushik Kar,et al.  BEES: Real-time occupant feedback and environmental learning framework for collaborative thermal management in multi-zone, multi-occupant buildings , 2016 .

[12]  Daniel Nikovski,et al.  An IoT system to estimate personal thermal comfort , 2016, 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[13]  Jörn von Grabe,et al.  How do occupants decide their interactions with the building? From qualitative data to a psychological framework of human-building-interaction , 2016 .

[14]  Thomas Parkinson,et al.  Thermal pleasure in built environments: physiology of alliesthesia , 2015 .

[15]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  Towards unsupervised learning of thermal comfort using infrared thermography , 2018 .

[16]  Jakub Kolarik,et al.  Method for long-term mapping of occupancy patterns in open-plan and single office spaces by using passive-infrared (PIR) sensors mounted below desks , 2021 .

[17]  R. Oliver Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective On The Consumer , 1996 .

[18]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[19]  Francesco Goia,et al.  Design and in-field testing of a multi-level system for continuous subjective occupant feedback on indoor climate , 2020 .

[20]  Siti Aisyah Damiati,et al.  Evaluating assumptions of scales for subjective assessment of thermal environments – Do laypersons perceive them the way, we researchers believe? , 2020, Energy and Buildings.

[21]  Hui Zhang,et al.  EXTENDING AIR TEMPERATURE SETPOINTS: SIMULATED ENERGY SAVINGS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR NEW AND RETROFIT BUILDINGS , 2015 .

[22]  Italo Meroni,et al.  Integrated Method for Personal Thermal Comfort Assessment and Optimization through Users’ Feedback, IoT and Machine Learning: A Case Study , 2018, Sensors.

[23]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  Participatory Sensing: Crowdsourcing Data from Mobile Smartphones in Urban Spaces , 2011, 2011 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Data Management.

[24]  Francesco Goia,et al.  Field investigations of a smiley-face polling station for recording occupant satisfaction with indoor climate , 2020 .

[25]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  Infrared thermography of human face for monitoring thermoregulation performance and estimating personal thermal comfort , 2016 .

[26]  Edward Arens,et al.  Occupant comfort and behavior: High-resolution data from a 6-month field study of personal comfort systems with 37 real office workers , 2019, Building and Environment.

[27]  A. Wagner,et al.  Thermal expectation: Influencing factors and its effect on thermal perception , 2020 .

[28]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Employee Satisfaction: Does Kano's Model Apply? , 2004 .

[29]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction , 2012 .

[30]  Prageeth Jayathissa,et al.  Is your clock-face cozie? A smartwatch methodology for the in-situ collection of occupant comfort data , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[31]  Maohui Luo,et al.  The uncertainty of subjective thermal comfort measurement , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[32]  Carol C. Menassa,et al.  Personalized human comfort in indoor building environments under diverse conditioning modes , 2017 .

[33]  Carlos Duarte,et al.  Revealing occupancy patterns in an office building through the use of occupancy sensor data , 2013 .

[34]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  Get the picture? Lessons learned from a smartphone-based post-occupancy evaluation , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[35]  Ian Beausoleil-Morrison,et al.  Development and implementation of a thermostat learning algorithm , 2018 .

[36]  S. R. Wallace Encyclopedia of psychology. , 1947, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  P. Wilton,et al.  Models of Consumer Satisfaction Formation: An Extension , 1988 .

[38]  Paulo Carreira,et al.  Can HVAC really learn from users? A simulation-based study on the effectiveness of voting for comfort and energy use optimization , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[39]  Gail Brager,et al.  Commercial Office Plug Load Energy Consumption Trends and the Role of Occupant Behavior , 2016 .

[40]  Nalini Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Exploring fairness in participatory thermal comfort control in smart buildings , 2017, BuildSys@SenSys.

[41]  David Alan Kopec,et al.  Environmental Psychology for Design , 2006 .

[42]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[43]  William O'Brien,et al.  A method to conduct longitudinal studies on indoor environmental quality and perceived occupant comfort , 2019, Building and Environment.

[44]  Alberto Cerpa,et al.  Thermovote: participatory sensing for efficient building HVAC conditioning , 2012, BuildSys@SenSys.

[45]  N Lassen,et al.  Experimental setup and testing of an in-field system for real- time occupant feedback , 2019 .

[46]  Ming Jin,et al.  Personal thermal comfort models with wearable sensors , 2019, Building and Environment.

[47]  Burak Gunay,et al.  A critical review of field implementations of occupant-centric building controls , 2019, Building and Environment.

[48]  Siew Eang Lee,et al.  Review of occupancy sensing systems and occupancy modeling methodologies for the application in institutional buildings , 2016 .

[49]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings? , 2007 .

[50]  Farrokh Jazizadeh,et al.  Human-in-the-loop HVAC operations: A quantitative review on occupancy, comfort, and energy-efficiency dimensions , 2019, Applied Energy.

[51]  Jakub Kolarik,et al.  Design and application of occupant voting systems for collecting occupant feedback on indoor environmental quality of buildings – A review , 2020 .

[52]  Kyle Konis Leveraging ubiquitous computing as a platform for collecting real-time occupant feedback in buildings , 2013 .

[53]  Richard L. Oliver,et al.  Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective On The Consumer , 1996 .

[54]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind , 1998 .

[55]  A. K. Mishra,et al.  Thermal comfort of heterogeneous and dynamic indoor conditions - An overview , 2016 .

[56]  Angela Sanguinetti,et al.  Occupant thermal feedback for improved efficiency in university buildings , 2017 .

[57]  Joyce Kim,et al.  Personal comfort models – A new paradigm in thermal comfort for occupant-centric environmental control , 2018 .

[58]  A. Mahdavi,et al.  IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings , 2017 .