Effects of six primary tillage implements on energy inputs and residue cover in Central Italy

The use of agricultural machinery represents the main aspect contributing to the total energy input in the agricultural system. The study evaluated the energy requirements and the work quality of two conventional (threefurrow plough and spading machine) and of four conservation implements (rotary harrow, subsoiler, disk harrow, combined cultivator) for mediumdeep primary tillage in a silty-clay soil, widespread in Central Italy. The tests were carried out with the aim of selecting the most energy-efficient implement. Working speed, force of traction, fuel consumption and energy demands were measured, using a 205 kW instrumented tractor. Cloddiness and roughness of the tilled soil, biomass coverage index and burying degree were evaluated. The conservation tillage implements gave the best results in fuel consumption and energy requirements respect to the conventional implements, with energy savings up to 86% in the case of disk harrow. The rotary harrow showed intermediate values and the best soil refinement. Among the conservation implements, the disk harrow showed the best performance on biomass coverage index (43.8%), while the combined cultivator showed the highest value of biomass burying (87.8%) and the best performance on fuel consumption per hour (25.8 kg h –1 ).

[1]  M. J. Romkens,et al.  Effect of Tillage on Surface Roughness , 1986 .

[2]  P. B. DeLaune,et al.  Impact of tillage on runoff in long term no-till wheat systems , 2012 .

[3]  Josef Boxberger,et al.  Energy consumption in cultivating and ploughing with traction improvement system and consideration of the rear furrow wheel-load in ploughing , 2013 .

[4]  Hifjur Raheman,et al.  Draught Prediction of Agricultural Implements using Reference Tillage Tools in Sandy Clay Loam Soil , 2006 .

[5]  Richard J. Godwin,et al.  A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement forces , 2007 .

[6]  Johan Arvidsson,et al.  Specific draught for mouldboard plough, chisel plough and disc harrow at different water contents , 2004 .

[7]  Fabio Pezzi.  Traditional and new deep soil tillage techniques in Italy , 2005 .

[8]  Daniele Pochi,et al.  ENERGY REQUIREMENT OF A TILLAGE METHOD FOR SPINACH CULTIVATION , 2011 .

[9]  Randy L. Raper,et al.  TILLAGE DEPTH, TILLAGE TIMING, AND COVER CROP EFFECTS ON COTTON YIELD, SOIL STRENGTH, AND TILLAGE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS , 2000 .

[10]  Craig F. Drury,et al.  Energy Inputs for Conservation and Conventional Primary Tillage Implements in a Clay Loam Soil , 2008 .

[11]  David A. Lobb,et al.  EFFECTS OF SIX TILLAGE METHODS ON RESIDUE INCORPORATION AND CROP PERFORMANCE IN A HEAVY CLAY SOIL , 2004 .

[12]  Abdulrahman Al-Janobi,et al.  Draught Requirements of Tillage Implements Operating on Sandy Loam Soil , 1997 .

[13]  M Raffaelli,et al.  Proposta di metodologia per la valutazione della qualità del lavoro svolto dalle macchine per la lavorazione del terreno , 1999 .

[14]  T. Anken,et al.  Comparison of methods for determining cloddiness in seedbed preparation , 1998 .

[15]  Marco Fedrizzi,et al.  Dynamic-energetic balance of agricultural tractors: active systems for the measurement of the power requirements in static tests and under field conditions , 2013 .

[16]  S. G. Pawar,et al.  Influence of forward speed and tillage depth on draft of primary tillage implements in sandy loam soil. , 2013 .

[17]  N. B. McLaughlin,et al.  ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE FOLLOWING DIFFERENT CROP ROTATIONS , 1997 .

[18]  Daniele Pochi,et al.  Testing of Soil Tillage Machinery , 2010 .

[19]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security , 2004, Science.

[20]  R. L. Raper,et al.  In-Row Subsoiling: A Review and Suggestions for Reducing Cost of this Conservation Tillage Operation , 2007 .