Three-dimensional Elastic Image Registration Based on Strain Energy Minimization: Application to Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in conjunction with an endorectal coil is currently the clinical standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer because of the increased sensitivity and specificity of this approach. However, imaging in this manner provides images and spectra of the prostate in the deformed state because of the insertion of the endorectal coil. Such deformation may lead to uncertainties in the localization of prostate cancer during therapy. We propose a novel 3-D elastic registration procedure that is based on the minimization of a physically motivated strain energy function that requires the identification of similar features (points, curves, or surfaces) in the source and target images. The Gauss–Seidel method was used in the numerical implementation of the registration algorithm. The registration procedure was validated on synthetic digital images, MR images from prostate phantom, and MR images obtained on patients. The registration error, assessed by averaging the displacement of a fiducial landmark in the target to its corresponding point in the registered image, was 0.2 ± 0.1 pixels on synthetic images. On the prostate phantom and patient data, the registration errors were 1.0 ± 0.6 pixels (0.6 ± 0.4 mm) and 1.8 ± 0.7 pixels (1.1 ± 0.4 mm), respectively. Registration also improved image similarity (normalized cross-correlation) from 0.72 ± 0.10 to 0.96 ± 0.03 on patient data. Registration results on digital images, phantom, and prostate data in vivo demonstrate that the registration procedure can be used to significantly improve both the accuracy of localized therapies such as brachytherapy or external beam therapy and can be valuable in the longitudinal follow-up of patients after therapy.

[1]  David L. Wilson,et al.  Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  J. García-Segura,et al.  Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer. , 1997, European urology.

[3]  B. Daniel,et al.  Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. , 2004, Medical physics.

[4]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Parameter-Free Elastic Deformation Approach for 2D and 3D Registration Using Prescribed Displacements , 1999, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[6]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging identifies locally advanced prostate cancer in select patients with clinically localized disease. , 1998, Urology.

[10]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Image registration based on boundary mapping , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Finite-Element Methods for Active Contour Models and Balloons for 2-D and 3-D Images , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medial Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery , 1997 .

[13]  Steven S. Beauchemin,et al.  The computation of optical flow , 1995, CSUR.

[14]  A R Padhani,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[15]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  MR imaging in local staging of prostate cancer. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[17]  W S Bice,et al.  CT and MRI derived source localization error in a custom prostate phantom using automated image coregistration. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[19]  Boyd McCurdy,et al.  A feasibility study to investigate the use of thin-plate splines to account for prostate deformation. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[21]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Two-Step Parameter-Free Elastic Image Registration with Prescribed Point Displacements , 1997, ICIAP.

[22]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  David L Wilson,et al.  A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[24]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Advances in elastic matching theory and its implementation , 1997, CVRMed.

[25]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Magnetic resonance image‐guided salvage brachytherapy after radiation in select men who initially presented with favorable‐risk prostate cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[26]  A. Ugural,et al.  Advanced strength and applied elasticity , 1981 .

[27]  C. Broit Optimal registration of deformed images , 1981 .