Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An in-vitro study

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a positioning method with hand-guiding and contact position feedback of robot based on a human-robot collaborative dental implant system (HRCDIS) for robotic guided dental implant surgery. METHODS An HRCDIS was developed based on a light-weight cooperative robot arm, UR5. A three-dimensional (3D) virtual partially edentulous mandibular bone was reconstructed using the cone bone computed tomography images. After designing the preoperative virtual implant planning using the computer software, a fixation guide worn on teeth for linking and fixing positioning marker was fabricated by 3D printing. The fixation guide with the positioning marker and a resin model mimicking the oral tissues were assembled on a head phantom. The planned implant positions were derived by the coordinate information of the positioning marker. The drilling process using the HRCDIS was conducted after mimicking the experimental set-up and planning the drilling trajectory. Deviations between actual and planned implant positions were measured and analyzed. RESULTS The head phantom experiments results showed that the error value of the central deviation at hex (refers to the center of the platform level of the implant) was 0.79 ± 0.17 mm, central deviation at the apex was 1.26 ± 0.27 mm, horizontal deviation at the hex was 0.61 ± 0.19 mm, horizontal deviation at the apex was 0.91 ± 0.55 mm, vertical deviation at the hex was 0.38 ± 0.17 mm, vertical deviation at the apex was 0.37 ± 0.20 mm, and angular deviation was 3.77 ± 1.57°. CONCLUSIONS The results from this study preliminarily validate the feasibility of the accurate navigation method of the HRCDIS.

[1]  Rui Figueiredo,et al.  Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study , 2018, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[2]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. , 2019, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[3]  Daniel Wismeijer,et al.  The accuracy of static computer‐aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  Ai Komiyama,et al.  Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[5]  Zheng Wang,et al.  A Customizable, Compact Robotic Manipulator for Assisting Multiple Dental Procedures , 2018, 2018 3rd International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM).

[6]  Y. Wong,et al.  Accuracy of implant placement with a computer‐aided fabricated surgical template with guided parallel pins: A pilot study , 2018, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[7]  Xiaoyan Sun,et al.  Automated dental implantation using image-guided robotics: registration results , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  Huey-Er Lee,et al.  The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system , 2019, BMC oral health.

[9]  Z. Haidar Autonomous Robotics: A fresh Era of Implant Dentistry … is a reality! , 2017 .

[10]  Guillaume Champleboux,et al.  Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  Sundeep Rawal,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Prosthetically Driven Planning and Immediate Placement of a Dental Implant. , 2020, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[12]  Kerstin Johansen,et al.  Potential Advantages Using Large Anthropomorphic Robots in Human-robot Collaborative, Hand Guided Assembly , 2016 .

[13]  Jing Qin,et al.  Pilot study of a surgical robot system for zygomatic implant placement. , 2019, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  W. Korb,et al.  Robots in the operating theatre--chances and challenges. , 2004, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  Pedro Neto,et al.  End-Effector Precise Hand-Guiding for Collaborative Robots , 2017, ROBOT.

[16]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study. , 2018, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[17]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  Shengchi Fan,et al.  Robotics in Dental Implantology. , 2019, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[19]  Robert W Emery,et al.  Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. , 2016, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[20]  Jörg Raczkowsky,et al.  Robot Assistant for Dental Implantology , 2001, MICCAI.

[21]  Sotirios A. Tsaftaris,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention , 2017 .

[22]  A. Di Fiore,et al.  2D/3D accuracies of implant position after guided surgery using different surgical protocols: A retrospective study. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[23]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  A Compact Dental Robotic System Using Soft Bracing Technique , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[24]  R. Emery,et al.  Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery. , 2019, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[25]  Kerstin Johansen,et al.  Safe Assembly Cell Layout through Risk Assessment – An Application with Hand Guided Industrial Robot , 2017 .