Improving specificity of DNA hybridization-based methods.

Methods based on DNA reassociation in solution with the subsequent PCR amplification of certain hybrid molecules, such as coincidence cloning and subtractive hybridization, all suffer from a common imperfection: cross-hybridization between various types of paralogous repetitive DNA fragments. Although the situation can be slightly improved by the addition of repeat-specific competitor DNA into the hybridization mixture, the cross-hybridization outcome is a significant number of background chimeric clones in resulting DNA libraries. In order to overcome this challenge, we developed a technique called mispaired DNA rejection (MDR), which utilizes a treatment of resulting reassociated DNA with mismatch-specific nucleases. We examined the MDR efficiency using cross-hybridization of complex, whole genomic mixtures derived from human and chimpanzee genomes, digested with frequent-cutter restriction enzyme. We show here that both single-stranded DNA-specific and mismatched double-stranded DNA-specific nucleases can be used for MDR separately or in combination, reducing the background level from 60 to 4% or lower. The technique presented here is of universal usefulness and can be applied to both cDNA and genomic DNA subtractions of very complex DNA mixtures. MDR is also useful for the genome-wide recovery of highly conserved DNA sequences, as we demonstrate by comparing human and pygmy marmoset genomes.

[1]  G. Rohrmann,et al.  Binding of the baculovirus very late expression factor 1 (VLF-1) to different DNA structures , 2002, BMC Molecular Biology.

[2]  J. Durocher,et al.  Mutation detection using Surveyor nuclease. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[3]  A. Godwin,et al.  CEL I enzymatic mutation detection assay. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[4]  S. Lukyanov,et al.  Equalizing cDNA subtraction based on selective suppression of polymerase chain reaction: cloning of Jurkat cell transcripts induced by phytohemaglutinin and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. , 1996, Analytical biochemistry.

[5]  N. Enomoto,et al.  Overexpression of interferon γ-inducible protein 10 in the liver of patients with type i autoimmune hepatitis identified by suppression subtractive hybridization , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  มาลา ตรีวัชรีกร,et al.  Nucleic acid hybridization , 1998 .

[7]  T. Sugimura,et al.  Highly efficient method for obtaining a subtracted genomic DNA library by the modified in-gel competitive reassociation method. , 1994, Cancer research.

[8]  E. Sverdlov,et al.  Retroviruses and primate evolution. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[9]  M. Wigler,et al.  Representational difference analysis in detection of genetic lesions in cancer. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  I. Gottesman,et al.  High polymorphism level of genomic sequences flanking insertion sites of human endogenous retroviral long terminal repeats , 1999, FEBS letters.

[11]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[12]  A. Flavell,et al.  Nucleic acid hybridization: A practical approach: B.D. Hames and S.J. Higgins (editors) IRL Press Ltd., Oxford, UK, 256 pp., £14.00/US$25.00 (softbound), £22.00/US$40.00 (hardbound), ISBN 0-947946-23-3 (softbound), ISBN 0-947946-61-6 (hardbound) , 1987 .

[13]  Aaron P. Campbell,et al.  Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[16]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[17]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  Mismatch cleavage by single-strand specific nucleases. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  R. Cotton,et al.  The use of resolvases T4 endonuclease VII and T7 endonuclease I in mutation detection , 2003, Molecular biotechnology.

[19]  F. Barany,et al.  An endonuclease/ligase based mutation scanning method especially suited for analysis of neoplastic tissue , 2002, Oncogene.

[20]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .