A policy strategy for carbon capture and storage

2012 January This paper is published under the authority of the Sustainable Energy Policy and Technology Directorate and may not reflect the views of individual IEA member countries. The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – twofold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 28 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy cooperation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency's aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries' access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. n Find solutions to global energy challenges through engagement and dialogue with non-member countries, industry, international organisations and other stakeholders. The European Commission also participates in the work of the IEA. Please note that this publication is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at Acknowledgements This report drew from the expertise of many individuals both inside and outside the IEA. Special thanks go to our consultants Robin Smale, John Ward and Max Krahe at Vivid Economics for expert advice and for developing the draft text. from the IEA Secretariat provided numerous suggestions on various versions of the entire manuscript, while the section on BECCS benefited from input from Dr. Sabine Fuss and Dr. Florian Kraxner, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Lastly, thanks should also go to the following peer reviewers for making time available to read the manuscript and for providing constructive comments: Dr. Executive summary This guide for policy makers aims to assist those involved in designing national and international …

[1]  J. DeCicco Addressing Biofuel GHG Emissions in the Context of a Fossil-Based Carbon Cap , 2009 .

[2]  David Wheeler,et al.  Quantifying Vulnerability to Climate Change: Implications for Adaptation Assistance , 2011 .

[3]  Jisung Park,et al.  Combining Multiple Climate Policy Instruments: How Not to Do It , 2010 .

[4]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[5]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[6]  André Faaij,et al.  Planning for an electricity sector with carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[7]  Alphonse P. Magnus,et al.  Prices versus quantities , 2006 .

[8]  K. Hamilton Unlocking Finance for Clean Energy: The Need for 'Investment Grade' Policy , 2009 .

[9]  Jim Watson,et al.  Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: A qualitative multi-criteria analysis , 2011 .

[10]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs , 2010 .

[11]  Heleen Groenenberg,et al.  Policy instruments for advancing CCS in Dutch power generation , 2011 .

[12]  D. Newbery,et al.  Carbon capture and storage (CCS) analysis of incentives and rules in a European repeated game situation , 2009 .

[13]  P. Wilcoxen,et al.  A CREDIBLE FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE , 2006 .

[14]  Cédric Philibert,et al.  Interactions of Policies for Renewable Energy and Climate , 2011 .

[15]  Leonardo Barreto,et al.  Biomass-fired cogeneration systems with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[16]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  REGULATION BY PRICES, QUANTITIES, OR BOTH: A REVIEW OF INSTRUMENT , 2006 .

[17]  Hari M. Osofsky Caching the carbon : The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage , 2010 .

[18]  N. Kulichenko,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage in Developing Countries: A Perspective on Barriers to Deployment , 2012 .

[19]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[20]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  Credible Carbon Policy , 2003 .

[21]  C. Mason,et al.  Co-Optimization of Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Sequestration , 2009 .

[22]  Luis M. Abadie,et al.  European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments , 2008 .

[23]  David W. Keith,et al.  Biomass with capture: negative emissions within social and environmental constraints: an editorial comment , 2008 .

[24]  Sanya Carley State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness , 2009 .

[25]  L. Wackett Bioenergy , 1981, Microbial biotechnology.

[26]  M. Grubb,et al.  The impact of instrument choice on investment in abatement technologies: a case study of tax versus trade incentives for CCS and Biomass for electricity , 2010 .

[27]  Karsten Neuhoff,et al.  Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development , 2008 .

[28]  Melzer Consulting,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF CO 2 STORAGE IN CO 2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PROJECTS , 2010 .