No evidence of modulation of indirect plant resistance of Brassica rapa plants by volatiles from soil‐borne fungi

Upon herbivory, plants emit specific herbivore‐induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) that can attract natural enemies of the herbivore thus serving as indirect plant resistance. Not only insect herbivores, but microorganisms may also affect HIPV emission before or after plant colonisation, which in turn can affect behaviour of natural enemies of the herbivore. Yet, it remains elusive whether volatiles from microorganisms influence HIPV emission and indirect plant resistance. In this study, we investigated whether exposure of Brassica rapa roots to volatiles from soil‐borne fungi influence HIPV emission and the recruitment of natural enemies of Pieris brassicae larvae. Using a two‐compartment pot system, we performed greenhouse and common‐garden experiments, and we profiled plant HIPV emission. We found that exposure of plant roots to fungal volatiles did not affect the number of P. brassicae larvae recollected from the plants, suggesting a neutral effect of the fungal volatiles on natural predation. Likewise, in a greenhouse, similar numbers of larvae were parasitised by Cotesia glomerata wasps on control plants as on fungal volatile‐exposed plants. Additionally, chemical analysis of HIPV profiles revealed no qualitative and quantitative differences between control plants and fungal volatile‐exposed plants that were both infested with P. brassicae larvae. Together, our data indicate that root exposure to fungal volatiles did not affect indirect plant resistance to an insect herbivore. These findings provide new insight into the influence of indirect plant resistance by fungal volatiles that are discussed together with the effects of fungal volatiles on direct plant resistance.

[1]  David S. Wishart,et al.  Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for Comprehensive and Integrative Metabolomics Data Analysis , 2019, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[2]  M. Hilker,et al.  Defense of Scots pine against sawfly eggs (Diprion pini) is primed by exposure to sawfly sex pheromones , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Unsicker,et al.  What makes a volatile organic compound a reliable indicator of insect herbivory? , 2019, Plant, cell & environment.

[4]  D. Marković,et al.  Who is my neighbor? Volatile cues in plant interactions , 2019, Plant signaling & behavior.

[5]  Els M van de Zande,et al.  Volatiles of pathogenic and non-pathogenic soil-borne fungi affect plant development and resistance to insects , 2019, Oecologia.

[6]  C. Ryu,et al.  Microbe-induced plant volatiles. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[7]  N. V. van Dam,et al.  Herbivore-induced plant volatiles accurately predict history of coexistence, diet breadth, and feeding mode of herbivores. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[8]  P. Fincheira,et al.  Microbial volatiles as plant growth inducers. , 2018, Microbiological research.

[9]  Current Knowledge and Future Challenges of Aboveground and Belowground Community Ecology , 2018 .

[10]  B. Piechulla,et al.  Effects of discrete bioactive microbial volatiles on plants and fungi. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.

[11]  R. Pierik,et al.  Plant Phenotypic and Transcriptional Changes Induced by Volatiles from the Fungal Root Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[12]  M. Dicke,et al.  Compatible and incompatible pathogen–plant interactions differentially affect plant volatile emissions and the attraction of parasitoid wasps , 2016 .

[13]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Bidirectional Interaction between Phyllospheric Microbiotas and Plant Volatile Emissions. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[14]  M. Dicke Plant phenotypic plasticity in the phytobiome: a volatile issue. , 2016, Current opinion in plant biology.

[15]  P. Paré,et al.  Augmenting Sulfur Metabolism and Herbivore Defense in Arabidopsis by Bacterial Volatile Signaling , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[16]  V. C. D. Cunha Volatile-mediated interactions in the rhizosphere , 2016 .

[17]  C. Ryu,et al.  Sweet scents from good bacteria: Case studies on bacterial volatile compounds for plant growth and immunity , 2016, Plant Molecular Biology.

[18]  Dominik K. Grosskinsky,et al.  Trichoderma volatiles effecting Arabidopsis: from inhibition to protection against phytopathogenic fungi , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[19]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Rhizobacterial colonization of roots modulates plant volatile emission and enhances the attraction of a parasitoid wasp to host-infested plants , 2015, Oecologia.

[20]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Variation in plant-mediated interactions between rhizobacteria and caterpillars: potential role of soil composition. , 2015, Plant biology.

[21]  M. Birkett,et al.  Chemical cues modulating electrophysiological and behavioural responses in the parasitic wasp Cotesia sesamiae , 2015 .

[22]  The volatile emission of Eurosta solidaginis primes herbivore-induced volatile production in Solidago altissima and does not directly deter insect feeding , 2014, BMC Plant Biology.

[23]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Caught between Parasitoids and Predators – Survival of a Specialist Herbivore on Leaves and Flowers of Mustard Plants , 2014, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[24]  M. Erb,et al.  Volatiles produced by soil-borne endophytic bacteria increase plant pathogen resistance and affect tritrophic interactions. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.

[25]  D. Tholl,et al.  Volatile Organic Compound Mediated Interactions at the Plant-Microbe Interface , 2013, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[26]  C. Ryu,et al.  Two Volatile Organic Compounds Trigger Plant Self-Defense against a Bacterial Pathogen and a Sucking Insect in Cucumber under Open Field Conditions , 2013, International journal of molecular sciences.

[27]  Parasitic wasp females are attracted to blends of host-induced plant volatiles: do qualitative and quantitative differences in the blend matter? , 2013, F1000Research.

[28]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Non-pathogenic rhizobacteria interfere with the attraction of parasitoids to aphid-induced plant volatiles via jasmonic acid signalling. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[29]  B. Schulz,et al.  A fine line – endophytes or pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2012 .

[30]  M. Farag,et al.  Induced Resistance by a Long-Chain Bacterial Volatile: Elicitation of Plant Systemic Defense by a C13 Volatile Produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  J. Gershenzon,et al.  The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. , 2012, Trends in plant science.

[32]  T. Bukovinszky,et al.  Plants under multiple herbivory: consequences for parasitoid search behaviour and foraging efficiency , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  A. Bailly,et al.  The modulating effect of bacterial volatiles on plant growth , 2012, Plant signaling & behavior.

[34]  Y. M. Tikunov,et al.  MSClust: a tool for unsupervised mass spectra extraction of chromatography-mass spectrometry ion-wise aligned data , 2011, Metabolomics.

[35]  M. G. Cervantes-Badillo,et al.  The plant growth-promoting fungus Aspergillus ustus promotes growth and induces resistance against different lifestyle pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2011, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[36]  J. Daniel Hare Ecological role of volatiles produced by plants in response to damage by herbivorous insects. , 2011, Annual review of entomology.

[37]  M. Jeong,et al.  Proteome analysis of Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to bacterial volatiles , 2010, Planta.

[38]  J. Silvain,et al.  Importance of contact chemical cues in host recognition and acceptance by the braconid larval endoparasitoids Cotesia sesamiae and Cotesia flavipes , 2010 .

[39]  C. Pieterse,et al.  Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. , 2010, Trends in plant science.

[40]  M. Dicke,et al.  Variation in natural plant products and the attraction of bodyguards involved in indirect plant defense , 2010 .

[41]  E. Pichersky,et al.  The Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatile Methyl Salicylate Negatively Affects Attraction of the Parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[42]  J. J. Jansen,et al.  Field parasitism rates of caterpillars on Brassica oleracea plants are reliably predicted by differential attraction of Cotesia parasitoids , 2009 .

[43]  L. Macías-Rodríguez,et al.  The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[44]  M. Höfte,et al.  Interactions between cauliflower and Rhizoctonia anastomosis groups with different levels of aggressiveness , 2009, BMC Plant Biology.

[45]  Arjen Lommen,et al.  MetAlign: interface-driven, versatile metabolomics tool for hyphenated full-scan mass spectrometry data preprocessing. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[46]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  M. Dicke,et al.  Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles Mediate In-Flight Host Discrimination by Parasitoids , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[48]  J. Ruther,et al.  Plant–Plant Signaling: Ethylene Synergizes Volatile Emission In Zea mays Induced by Exposure to (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[49]  Ted C. J. Turlings,et al.  Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots , 2005, Nature.

[50]  P. Bakker,et al.  Induction of systemic resistance byPseudomonas fluorescens in radish cultivars differing in susceptibility to fusarium wilt, using a novel bioassay , 1995, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[51]  M. Dicke,et al.  The parasitoidCotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) discriminates between first and fifth larval instars of its hostPieris brassicae, on the basis of contact cues from frass, silk, and herbivore-damaged leaf tissue , 1995, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[52]  A. Agrawal,et al.  A Role for Isothiocyanates in Plant Resistance Against the Specialist Herbivore Pieris rapae , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[53]  D. Papaj,et al.  Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids , 2001 .

[54]  A. Shelton,et al.  ARTHROPOD PREDATORS IN CABBAGE (CRUCIFERAE) AND THEIR POTENTIAL AS NATURALLY OCCURRING BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR PIERIS RAPAE (LEPIDOPTERA: PIERIDAE) , 2000, The Canadian Entomologist.

[55]  Martin J. Mueller,et al.  Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis requires sensitivity to jasmonate and ethylene but is not accompanied by an increase in their production , 2000 .

[56]  L. Vet,et al.  Effects of Pieris host species on life history parameters in a solitary specialist and gregarious generalist parasitoid (Cotesia species) , 1998 .

[57]  L. M. Schoonhoven,et al.  Insect-plant biology , 1998 .

[58]  L. Vet,et al.  The role of host species, age and defensive behaviour on ovipositional decisions in a solitary specialist and gregarious generalist parasitoid (Cotesia species) , 1996 .

[59]  R. Adams,et al.  Identification of Essential Oil Components By Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry , 2007 .

[60]  M. Dicke,et al.  beta-Glucosidase: an elicitor of herbivore-induced plant odor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  J. Brodeur,et al.  Host species affecting the performance of the larval parasitoids Cotesia glomerata and C. rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). 2. Comparative suitability of three Pieris species (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). , 1992 .

[62]  M. Sabelis,et al.  How Plants Obtain Predatory Mites as Bodyguards , 1987 .