Institutional discourse

Several studies of institutionell discourse are reviewed discourse where one person who represents an Institution encounters another person seeking its Services. Focusing particularly on studies in the courtroom and the clinic, a framework is developed that divides the discourse into diagnoses, directives and reports. The framework not only organizes the different studies, but also provides links to discursively based social theones such äs those ofFoucault and Habermas.

[1]  Political Talk: Thematic Analysis Of A Policy Argument , 1983 .

[2]  Christine Parks.  The social organization of doctor-patient communication , 1984 .

[3]  B. Danet,et al.  Challenge and control in lawyer-client interaction: A case study in an Israeli Legal Aid office , 1984 .

[4]  Donna Mayo Vargas.  Two types of legal discourse: Transitivity in American appellate opinions and casebooks , 1984 .

[5]  H. Mehan.  The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making , 1983, Language in Society.

[6]  R. Menéndez Corrada,et al.  [Language and medicine]. , 1980, Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico.

[7]  Brenda Danet.  The magic flute: A prosodic analysis of binomial expressions in legal Hebrew , 1984 .

[8]  A. Cicourel.  LANGUAGE AND THE STRUCTURE OF BELIEF IN MEDICAL COMMUNICATION , 1981 .

[9]  D. Kurzon.  Themes, hyperthemes and the discourse structure of British legal texts , 1984 .

[10]  Tamar Liebes-Plesner.  Rhetoric in the service of justice: The sociolinguistic construction of stereotypes in an Israeli rape trial , 1984 .

[11]  Beatrice Caesar-Wolf.  The construction of ‘adjudicable’ evidence in a West German civil hearing , 1984 .

[12]  J. Bilmes.  Proposition and confrontation in a legal discussion , 1981 .

[13]  Susan Urmston Philips.  The social organization of questions and answers in courtroom discourse: A study of changes of plea in an Arizona court , 1984 .

[14]  Giles. Fletcher.  The order of the Discourse , 1966 .