Capturing Learning and Applying Knowledge: An Investigation of the Use of Innovation Teams in Japanese and American Automotive Firms

Abstract Many organizations view teams as a means to enhance the development of new products and systems. Here we report on the use of teams by two automotive firms. Each organization used different approaches to meet the same goal—innovation to reduce costs. Choice of strategy is significant in determining the level of output teams achieve. An important role is played by those outside firms in stimulating ideas and learning. However, the team plays a crucial role in selecting these externals, with attempts by the organization to provide predetermined experts appearing to be limited. This external assistance coupled with a team's internal drive to improve are significant in raising the quality of an innovative product. Efforts by firms to enforce standardized procedures have paradoxical impacts, resulting in the initial constraint of the team ideas, while enhancing any benefits of innovation across the whole organization.

[1]  David L. Altheide Ethnographic Content Analysis , 1987 .

[2]  John Bessant Big Bang or Continuous Evolution: Why Incremental Innovation is Gaining Attention in Successful Organisations , 1992 .

[3]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Team Organization: An Enduring Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[4]  Nigel King,et al.  The qualitative research interview , 1994 .

[5]  J. West Teaching Public Personnel Management in Three Types of Higher Educational Institutions , 1994 .

[6]  M. Ronald Buckley,et al.  The Changing Roles of Managers within the Supply Chain Networks: Theory and Practical Implications , 2000 .

[7]  L R James,et al.  Age-Related Changes in the Likelihood of Major Contributions , 1989, International journal of aging & human development.

[8]  J. Levine,et al.  Anticipated interaction and thought generation : The role of faction size , 1996 .

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  Impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment. , 1969 .

[10]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[11]  David L. Altheide Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis , 1987 .

[12]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[13]  Robert Albanese,et al.  Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .

[14]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Michael A. West,et al.  The personality of teamworking , 1994 .

[16]  R. Forrester,et al.  Implications of lean manufacturing for human resource strategy , 1995 .

[17]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Creativity Techniques in Product Planning and Development : A View from West Germany : R&D Management , 1983 .

[18]  Harry Nyström,et al.  Creativity and Innovation , 1979 .

[19]  B. Fisher,et al.  Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making , 1970 .

[20]  Michael A. West,et al.  The social psychology of innovation in groups. , 1990 .

[21]  Susanne Polewsky,et al.  Creativity workshops: Tools for innovation in organizations? , 1996 .

[22]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[23]  Richard H. Hycner Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data , 1985 .

[24]  R. Payne,et al.  Madness in our method. A comment on Jackofsky and Slocum's paper, ‘A longitudinal study of climates’ , 1990 .

[25]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .