False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age

Studies of age differences in face recognition have shown age-related increases in false-alarm errors: elderly persons exceed young adults in judging new faces to be old. To distinguish among theoretical accounts of this finding, we compared young and elderly subjects in two recognition tasks: (1) that of judging whether faces were recent or nonrecent, and (2) that of judging whether faces were famous or nonfamous. The major independent variable was prior presentation of faces—including nonrecent and nonfamous foils—1 week before the test. Falserecent judgments in response to nonrecent faces and falsefamous judgments in response to nonfamous faces were higher among the elderly. Moreover, these age-related differences in false-alarm rates were larger for faces viewed 1 week previously than for entirely new faces. The findings suggest that, compared to young adults, older individuals rely relatively more on perceived familiarity, and relatively less on recollection of context, in making recognition decisions.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[2]  Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame. , 1990 .

[3]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[4]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[5]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Typicality and familiarity of faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[6]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Face recognition memory: Distribution of false alarms , 1977 .

[7]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[8]  S. Harkins,et al.  Memory loss and response bias in senescence. , 1979, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  S H Ferris,et al.  Facial recognition memory deficits in normal aging and senile dementia. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[10]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[11]  Context utilization in young and old adults. , 1983, Journal of gerontology.

[12]  F. Craik.  On the making of episodes. , 1989 .

[13]  A. D. Smith,et al.  Partial Learning and Recognition Memory in the Aged , 1975, International journal of aging & human development.

[14]  D. Kausler,et al.  Adult age differences in false recognitions. , 1979, Journal of gerontology.

[15]  L L Light,et al.  Memory for scripts in young and older adults , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[16]  J. C. Rabinowitz.  Aging and recognition failure. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[17]  A. Young,et al.  The faces that launched a thousand slips: everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[18]  A. Young,et al.  The human face , 1982 .

[19]  E. Tulving.  Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[20]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. , 1985 .

[21]  R. Flin,et al.  Developmental factors in face processing , 1989 .

[22]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering left-right orientation of pictures. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  M K Johnson,et al.  Aging and source monitoring. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[24]  T. Hess.  Effects of semantically related and unrelated contexts on recognition memory of different-aged adults. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[25]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Cynthia G. Wible,et al.  Differential memory changes with age: Exact retrieval versus plausible inference. , 1986 .

[27]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in memory for item and source information. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  H D Ellis,et al.  Similarity effects in face recognition. , 1979, The American journal of psychology.

[29]  Eugene Winograd,et al.  Adult Age Differences in Remembering Faces. , 1978 .

[30]  J. A. List.  Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony. , 1986 .

[31]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[32]  E Winograd,et al.  Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[33]  D. Park,et al.  Older adults' memory for the color of pictures and words. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[34]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .

[35]  Felicia A. Huppert,et al.  The Role of Trace Strength in Recency and Frequency Judgements by Amnesic and Control Subjects , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  D. Park,et al.  Memory for pictures: does an age-related decline exist? , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[37]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Picture superiority in free recall: the effects of normal aging and primary degenerative dementia. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[38]  G. Cohen,et al.  Age differences in source forgetting: effects on reality monitoring and on eyewitness testimony. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[39]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Aging and memory for pictures of faces. , 1989, Psychology and aging.