Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces.

Cells swimming in confined environments are attracted by surfaces. We measure the steady-state distribution of smooth-swimming bacteria (Escherichia coli) between two glass plates. In agreement with earlier studies, we find a strong increase of the cell concentration at the boundaries. We demonstrate theoretically that hydrodynamic interactions of the swimming cells with solid surfaces lead to their reorientation in the direction parallel to the surfaces, as well as their attraction by the closest wall. A model is derived for the steady-state distribution of swimming cells, which compares favorably with our measurements. We exploit our data to estimate the flagellar propulsive force in swimming E. coli.

[1]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Influence of interfaces on microbial activity. , 1990, Microbiological reviews.

[2]  A. Dutta,et al.  Migration of macromolecules under flow: the physical origin and engineering implications , 1994 .

[3]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  On Torque and Tumbling in Swimming Escherichia coli , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  George M Whitesides,et al.  Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[5]  L. G. Leal,et al.  Particle Motions in a Viscous Fluid , 1980 .

[6]  H. Winet,et al.  Observations on the response of human spermatozoa to gravity, boundaries and fluid shear. , 1984, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[7]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  E. coli in Motion , 2003 .

[8]  Tomonobu Goto,et al.  Difference in bacterial motion between forward and backward swimming caused by the wall effect. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Isabelle Cantat,et al.  Lift Force and Dynamical Unbinding of Adhering Vesicles under Shear Flow , 1999 .

[10]  B. M. Fulk.  MATH , 1992 .

[11]  M. Graham,et al.  Transport and collective dynamics in suspensions of confined swimming particles. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[12]  Sangtae Kim,et al.  Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications , 1991 .

[13]  L. Fauci,et al.  Sperm motility in the presence of boundaries. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[14]  Piotr Garstecki,et al.  Escherichia coli swim on the right-hand side , 2005, Nature.

[15]  C Gagnon,et al.  How spermatozoa come to be confined to surfaces. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[16]  J. Blake,et al.  A note on the image system for a stokeslet in a no-slip boundary , 1971, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[17]  T. Pedley,et al.  Hydrodynamic Phenomena in Suspensions of Swimming Microorganisms , 1992 .

[18]  Chuck Yeung,et al.  Swimming efficiency of bacterium Escherichia coli , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  D. Woolley,et al.  Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces. , 2003, Reproduction.

[20]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  The role of hydrodynamic interaction in the locomotion of microorganisms. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[21]  A. Pacey,et al.  Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[22]  Udo Seifert.  Hydrodynamic lift on bound vesicles , 1999 .

[23]  R. Harshey,et al.  Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. , 2003, Annual review of microbiology.

[24]  H. Berg,et al.  Acetyladenylate plays a role in controlling the direction of flagellar rotation. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Mochón,et al.  Stokes flow for a stokeslet between two parallel flat plates , 1976 .

[26]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[27]  H. Berg,et al.  Three-dimensional tracking of motile bacteria near a solid planar surface. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.