This contribution deals with the question if and how non- linearities can improve the stability of bipedal locomotion. In order to investigate this issue, three nonlinear modifications of a planar point- mass model are investigated: the classical spring-mass model, a model with nonlinear leg kinematics and a model with a sophisticated nonlin- ear muscle model. Already the simple spring-mass model is nonlinear due to its variable stucture: this basic model will serve as a benchmark. Augmented with leg-kinematics the passive two segmented leg model in- corporates geometric non-linearities. By substituting the passive spring element by muscle-dynamics, the model is extended with physical non- linearities. The orbital stability of the periodic motion is analysed using Poincare-maps at touch down. A parameter study is carried out in order to reveal differences in performance and stability of periodic motion of the three models. The influence of the different types of non-linearities is demonstrated and discussed in detail.
[1]
R. Blickhan.
The spring-mass model for running and hopping.
,
1989,
Journal of biomechanics.
[2]
Juergen Rummel,et al.
Manuscript: Stable Running with Segmented Legs ¤
,
2008
.
[3]
Philip Holmes,et al.
A Simply Stabilized Running Model
,
2005,
SIAM Rev..
[4]
Philip Holmes,et al.
Running in Three Dimensions: Analysis of a Point-mass Sprung-leg Model
,
2005,
Int. J. Robotics Res..
[5]
Reinhard Blickhan,et al.
Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running
,
2006,
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[6]
Reinhard Blickhan,et al.
Positive force feedback in bouncing gaits?
,
2003,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[7]
A. Ruina.
Nonholonomic stability aspects of piecewise holonomic systems
,
1998
.