Preprocessing Reference Sensor Pattern Noise via Spectrum Equalization

Although sensor pattern noise (SPN) has been proved to be an effective means to uniquely identify digital cameras, some non-unique artifacts, shared among cameras undergo the same or similar in-camera processing procedures, often give rise to false identifications. Therefore, it is desirable and necessary to suppress these unwanted artifacts so as to improve the accuracy and reliability. In this paper, we propose a novel preprocessing approach for attenuating the influence of the non-unique artifacts on the reference SPN to reduce the false identification rate. Specifically, we equalize the magnitude spectrum of the reference SPN through detecting and suppressing the peaks according to the local characteristics, aiming at removing the interfering periodic artifacts. Combined with six SPN extractions or enhancement methods, our proposed spectrum equalization algorithm is evaluated on the Dresden image database as well as our own database, and compared with the state-of-the-art preprocessing schemes. The experimental results indicate that the proposed procedure outperforms, or at least performs comparable with, the existing methods in terms of the overall receiver operating characteristic curves and kappa statistic computed from a confusion matrix, and tends to be more resistant to JPEG compression for medium and small image blocks.

[1]  Yongjian Hu,et al.  Source Camera Identification Using Large Components of Sensor Pattern Noise , 2009, 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and its Applications.

[2]  Davide Cozzolino,et al.  A novel framework for image forgery localization , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  Matthias Kirchner,et al.  Unexpected artefacts in PRNU-based camera identification: a 'Dresden Image Database' case-study , 2012, MM&Sec '12.

[4]  Edmund Y. Lam,et al.  Source camera identification using footprints from lens aberration , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  L. Verdoliva,et al.  PRNU-based detection of small-size image forgeries , 2011, 2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[6]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  Color-Decoupled Photo Response Non-Uniformity for Digital Image Forensics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[7]  Mo Chen,et al.  Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[8]  Husrev T. Sencar,et al.  A study of the robustness of PRNU-based camera identification , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  On the influence of denoising in PRNU based forgery detection , 2010, MiFor '10.

[10]  Roberto Caldelli,et al.  Fast image clustering of unknown source images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security.

[11]  Mo Chen,et al.  Source digital camcorder identification using sensor photo response non-uniformity , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic , 1996, CL.

[13]  Jiwu Huang,et al.  Enhancing Source Camera Identification Performance With a Camera Reference Phase Sensor Pattern Noise , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[14]  Chia-Wen Lin,et al.  Video forgery detection using correlation of noise residue , 2008, 2008 IEEE 10th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.

[15]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Source camera identification based on CFA interpolation , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[16]  Hao Min,et al.  Modeling and estimation of FPN components in CMOS image sensors , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  Source Camera Identification Using Enhanced Sensor Pattern Noise , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[18]  Zeno J M H Geradts,et al.  Source Camera Identification for Heavily JPEG Compressed Low Resolution Still Images * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  The 'Dresden Image Database' for benchmarking digital image forensics , 2010, SAC '10.

[20]  Matthew James Sorrell Digital Camera Source Identification Through JPEG Quantisation , 2009 .

[21]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Large scale test of sensor fingerprint camera identification , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[22]  Francesco G. B. De Natale,et al.  Performance comparison of denoising filters for source camera identification , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  A context adaptive predictor of sensor pattern noise for camera source identification , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[24]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  Can we trust digital image forensics? , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[25]  Mo Chen,et al.  Defending Against Fingerprint-Copy Attack in Sensor-Based Camera Identification , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[26]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Identifying Source Cell Phone using Chromatic Aberration , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[27]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[28]  Matthias Kirchner,et al.  Fast and reliable resampling detection by spectral analysis of fixed linear predictor residue , 2008, MM&Sec '08.

[29]  Zeno Geradts,et al.  Methods for identification of images acquired with digital cameras , 2001, SPIE Optics East.

[30]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  Empirical investigation into the correlation between vignetting effect and the quality of sensor pattern noise , 2012 .

[31]  Kenji Kurosawa,et al.  CCD fingerprint method-identification of a video camera from videotaped images , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348).

[32]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Blind source camera identification , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[33]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Blind Identification of Source Cell-Phone Model , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[34]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital Camera Identification from Images - Estimating False Acceptance Probability , 2008, IWDW.

[35]  Ahmet Emir Dirik,et al.  Forensic use of photo response non-uniformity of imaging sensors and a counter method. , 2014, Optics express.

[36]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Using sensor pattern noise for camera model identification , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[37]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Heung-Kyu Lee,et al.  On classification of source cameras: A graph based approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security.

[39]  Chang-Tsun Li Unsupervised classification of digital images using enhanced sensor pattern noise , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[40]  Min Wu,et al.  Nonintrusive component forensics of visual sensors using output images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[41]  Xiangui Kang,et al.  A context-adaptive SPN predictor for trustworthy source camera identification , 2014, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[42]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  On the Repudiability of Device Identification and Image Integrity Verification Using Sensor Pattern Noise , 2009, ISDF.

[43]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[44]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  A Bayesian-MRF Approach for PRNU-Based Image Forgery Detection , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.