The Effect of Content on Zapping in TV Advertising

Consumers who are uninterested in or annoyed by a TV ad may avoid the ad, limiting the effectiveness of not only the ad but also the remaining commercial break. Active avoidance of ads by changing the channel—known as “zapping”—is potentially a major concern for both advertisers and broadcasters. In two studies, the authors investigate whether and why ad content drives or mitigates zapping and develop a conceptual framework linking multiple content factors to psychological reactions that then affect zapping. They test the content–zapping relationship by drawing on a data set reflecting the zapping behavior of over 2,500 German television viewers combined with advertising data and content information for 1,315 spots representing 308 brands from 96 categories. The results of the first study show that ad creativity is associated with less zapping, whereas a strong information focus and a prominent or early integration of branding elements are associated with more zapping. The findings also reveal that the effects differ significantly for products with a utilitarian (vs. hedonic) consumption purpose and for search (vs. experience) goods. The results of the second study show that irritation (determined by feeling, e.g., annoyed, offended, or overwhelmed), relative to enjoyment, acts as the central mechanism in explaining why ad content affects zapping.

[1]  Kenneth C. Wilbur,et al.  How Viewer Tuning, Presence, and Attention Respond to Ad Content and Predict Brand Search Lift , 2022, Marketing science (Providence, R.I.).

[2]  Ivan A. Guitart,et al.  The Impact of Informational and Emotional Television Ad Content on Online Search and Sales , 2020 .

[3]  M. Eisend,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of When and How Advertising Creativity Works , 2020, Journal of Marketing.

[4]  Norris I. Bruce,et al.  Communicating Brands in Television Advertising , 2020 .

[5]  J. S. Long,et al.  A General Framework for Comparing Predictions and Marginal Effects across Models , 2019, Sociological Methodology.

[6]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[7]  W. Reinartz,et al.  Does It Pay to Be Real? Understanding Authenticity in TV Advertising , 2018, Journal of Marketing.

[8]  Deepa Chandrasekaran,et al.  Effects of offline ad content on online brand search: insights from super bowl advertising , 2018 .

[9]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Television ad-skipping, consumption complementarities and the consumer demand for advertising , 2017 .

[10]  Jonah A. Berger,et al.  Valuable Virality , 2017 .

[11]  Stephen Richard Dix,et al.  Predictors of Commercial Zapping During Live Prime-Time Television , 2017, Journal of Advertising Research.

[12]  Yiting Deng,et al.  TV Viewing and Advertising Targeting , 2017 .

[13]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[14]  A. P. McGraw,et al.  Differentiating what is humorous from what is not. , 2016, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Kenneth C. Wilbur Advertising Content and Television Advertising Avoidance , 2015 .

[16]  Shu Z. Schiller,et al.  Consumer Reactions to Intrusiveness Of Online-Video Advertisements , 2015, Journal of Advertising Research.

[17]  Rana El Kaliouby,et al.  Why, When, and How Much to Entertain Consumers in Advertisements? A Web-Based Facial Tracking Field Study , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[18]  David A. Schweidel,et al.  Synergy or Interference: The Effect of Product Placement on Commercial Break Audience Decline , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[19]  Kenneth C. Wilbur,et al.  Television Advertising and Online Shopping , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[20]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  The Reach and Persuasiveness of Viral Video Ads , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[21]  Hauke A. Wetzel,et al.  Gratitude versus Entitlement: A Dual Process Model of the Profitability Implications of Customer Prioritization , 2014 .

[22]  Linli Xu,et al.  Correcting Audience Externalities in Television Advertising , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[23]  Horst Stipp,et al.  提携研究機関誌からの論文紹介 The Advertising Research Foundation 『Journal of Advertising Research』より : Optimizing the Amount of Entertainment in Advertising : What's So Funny about Tracking Reactions to Humor? , 2013 .

[24]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  The influence of ad-evoked feelings on brand evaluations: : Empirical generalizations from consumer responses to more than 1000 TV commercials , 2013 .

[25]  R. Pieters,et al.  Emotion-Induced Engagement in Internet Video Advertisements , 2012 .

[26]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[27]  M. Geuens,et al.  Emotional advertising: Revisiting the Role of Product Category , 2011 .

[28]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Moment-to-Moment Optimal Branding in TV Commercials: Preventing Avoidance by Pulsing , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[29]  David A. Schweidel,et al.  Predictors of the Gap between Program and Commercial Audiences: An Investigation using Live Tuning Data , 2010 .

[30]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[31]  Leonard N. Reid,et al.  Agency Practitioner Theories of How Advertising Works , 2009 .

[32]  Xiaojing Yang,et al.  Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[33]  Martin Eisend,et al.  A meta-analysis of humor in advertising , 2009 .

[34]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Kenneth C. Wilbur How the Digital Video Recorder (DVR) Changes Traditional Television Advertising , 2008 .

[36]  Xiaojing Yang,et al.  Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising , 2007 .

[37]  Paul Gustafson,et al.  Describing the Dynamics of Attention to TV Commercials: A Hierarchical Bayes Analysis of the Time to Zap an Ad , 2007 .

[38]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[39]  Ashesh Mukherjee,et al.  Humor in Television Advertising: A Moment-to-Moment Analysis , 2004 .

[40]  W. E. Baker,et al.  DO NOT WAIT TO REVEAL THE BRAND NAME: The Effect of Brand-Name Placement on Television Advertising Effectiveness , 2004 .

[41]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works , 2003 .

[42]  R. Pieters,et al.  Why Do Consumers Stop Viewing Television Commercials? Two Experiments on the Influence of Moment-to-Moment Entertainment and Information Value , 2003 .

[43]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[44]  Ambar G. Rao,et al.  Assessing When Increased Media Weight of Real-World Advertisements Helps Sales , 2002 .

[45]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[46]  R. Chandy,et al.  What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets , 2001 .

[47]  Dana L. Alden,et al.  The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive Moderators on Perceived Humor in Television Advertising , 2000 .

[48]  D. Jain,et al.  Consumer Choice Process for Experience Goods: An Econometric Model and Analysis , 1999 .

[49]  Michel Tuan Pham Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making , 1998 .

[50]  M. Strahilevitz,et al.  Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell , 1998 .

[51]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  To Zap Or Not to Zap: a Study of the Determinants of Channel Switching During Commercials , 1998 .

[52]  Marc G. Weinberger,et al.  Assessing the Use and Impact of Humor on Advertising Effectiveness: A Contingency Approach , 1997 .

[53]  Maryon King,et al.  The effects of expertise, end goal, and product type on adoption of preference formation strategy , 1994 .

[54]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Classical Conditioning Procedures on Subsequent Attention to the Conditioned Brand , 1993 .

[55]  J. Burgoon Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication , 1993 .

[56]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Value-Expressive versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal , 1991 .

[57]  M. Holbrook,et al.  Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude toward the Ad on Viewing Time , 1991 .

[58]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Humor in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Prior Brand Evaluation , 1990 .

[59]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Effective television advertising : a study of 1000 commercials , 1987 .

[60]  C. W. Park,et al.  Consumer Response to Television Commercials: The Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation , 1986 .

[61]  D. Aaker,et al.  Causes of Irritation in Advertising , 1985 .

[62]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review , 1982 .

[63]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[64]  P. Nelson Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[65]  Walter A. Woods,et al.  Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision , 1960 .

[66]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Information content and consumer readership of print ads: A comparison of search and experience products , 2004 .

[67]  R. Pieters,et al.  Goal-directed Emotions , 1998 .

[68]  Peter J. Danaher,et al.  WHAT HAPPENS TO TELEVISION RATINGS DURING COMMERCIAL BREAKS , 1995 .

[69]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[70]  K. B. Murray,et al.  The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variability , 1990 .

[71]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .