Maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization reconstruction of sinograms with arbitrary noise distribution using NEC-transformations

The maximum-likelihood (ML) expectation-maximization (EM) [ML-EM] algorithm is being widely used for image reconstruction in positron emission tomography. The algorithm is strictly valid if the data are Poisson distributed. However, it is also often applied to processed sinograms that do not meet this requirement. This may sometimes lead to suboptimal results: streak artifacts appear and the algorithm converges toward a lower likelihood value. As a remedy, the authors propose two simple pixel-by-pixel methods [noise equivalent counts (NEC)-scaling and NEC-shifting] in order to transform arbitrary sinogram noise into noise which is approximately Poisson distributed (the first and second moments of the distribution match those of the Poisson distribution). The convergence speed associated with both transformation methods is compared, and the NEC-scaling method is validated with both simulations and clinical data. These new methods extend the ML-EM algorithm to a general purpose nonnegative reconstruction algorithm.

[1]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction for Positron Emission Tomography Based on the EM Algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  E. Veklerov,et al.  Stopping Rule for the MLE Algorithm Based on Statistical Hypothesis Testing , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[8]  D. Snyder,et al.  Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  K Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT EXACT HR: Performance of a New High Resolution Positron Scanner , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Optimizing rod window width in positron emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction of Transmission Sinograms with Low Signal to Noise Ratio , 1997 .

[15]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[16]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Statistical image reconstruction methods for randoms-precorrected PET scans , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Claude Comtat,et al.  Preserving Poisson characteristics of PET data with weighted OSEM reconstruction , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[19]  M. Defrise,et al.  Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.