Measuring Abnormal Brains: Building Normative Rules in Neuroimaging Using One-Class Support Vector Machines

Pattern recognition methods have demonstrated to be suitable analyses tools to handle the high dimensionality of neuroimaging data. However, most studies combining neuroimaging with pattern recognition methods focus on two-class classification problems, usually aiming to discriminate patients under a specific condition (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease) from healthy controls. In this perspective paper we highlight the potential of the one-class support vector machines (OC-SVM) as an unsupervised or exploratory approach that can be used to create normative rules in a multivariate sense. In contrast with the standard SVM that finds an optimal boundary separating two classes (discriminating boundary), the OC-SVM finds the boundary enclosing a specific class (characteristic boundary). If the OC-SVM is trained with patterns of healthy control subjects, the distance to the boundary can be interpreted as an abnormality score. This score might allow quantification of symptom severity or provide insights about subgroups of patients. We provide an intuitive description of basic concepts in one-class classification, the foundations of OC-SVM, current applications, and discuss how this tool can bring new insights to neuroimaging studies.

[1]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Resting state cortical electroencephalographic rhythms are related to gray matter volume in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[2]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  An fMRI normative database for connectivity networks using one‐class support vector machines , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[3]  C. Jack,et al.  Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) , 2005, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[4]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2003, ICTAI.

[5]  Mary E. Meyerand,et al.  Support vector machine classification and characterization of age-related reorganization of functional brain networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  Ulrich Möller,et al.  Pitfalls in the Clustering of Neuroimage Data and Improvements by Global Optimization Strategies , 2001, NeuroImage.

[7]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  David M. J. Tax,et al.  Online SVM learning: from classification to data description and back , 2003, 2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718).

[9]  Keith Matthews,et al.  Prediction of illness severity in patients with major depression using structural MR brain scans , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[11]  David W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[12]  Li Min Li,et al.  Cerebral and corpus callosum atrophy in systemic lupus erythematosus. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  Owen Carmichael,et al.  Subtypes based on cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging markers in normal elderly predict cognitive decline , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[14]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[15]  M. Brammer,et al.  Pattern Classification of Sad Facial Processing: Toward the Development of Neurobiological Markers in Depression , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  L. Rohde,et al.  Abnormal Brain Connectivity Patterns in Adults with ADHD: A Coherence Study , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  Raghu Machiraju,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Brain States from fMRI Data , 2010, MICCAI.

[18]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[19]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with kernels , 1998 .

[21]  David R. Hardoon,et al.  fMRI Analysis via One-class Machine Learning Techniques , 2005, IJCAI.

[22]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[23]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[24]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[25]  E. Bigler,et al.  Hippocampal volume in normal aging and traumatic brain injury. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  S. Gabrieli Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010 .

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[29]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  Patient classification as an outlier detection problem: An application of the One-Class Support Vector Machine , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: Towards a Unifying Framework , 1996, KDD.

[31]  Hans-Jürgen Möller,et al.  Amygdala Volume and Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[32]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Diagnostic neuroimaging across diseases , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[34]  Xiaomu Song,et al.  Unsupervised spatiotemporal fMRI data analysis using support vector machines , 2009, NeuroImage.