Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability to contamination for Gaza coastal aquifer, Palestine.

Gaza coastal aquifer (GCA) is the major source of fresh water for the 1.5 million residents of Gaza Strip, Palestine. The aquifer is under deteriorating quality conditions mainly due to the excessive application of fertilizers. The intrinsic vulnerability of GCA to contamination was assessed using the well-known DRASTIC method. Detailed analysis of the intrinsic vulnerability map of GCA was carried out and did consider different relationships between the vulnerability indices and the on-ground nitrogen loadings and land use classes. In addition, correlation between vulnerability values and the nitrate concentrations in GCA was studied. Based on the vulnerability analysis, it was found that 10% and 13% of Gaza Strip area is under low and high vulnerability of groundwater contamination, respectively, while more than 77% of the area of Gaza Strip can be designated as an area of moderate vulnerability of groundwater contamination. It was found that the density of groundwater sampling wells for nitrate concentration is high for the moderate and high vulnerability zones. The highest first quartile, median, mean, and third quartile of nitrate concentrations are reported in the high vulnerability zones. Results of sensitivity analysis show a high sensitivity of the high vulnerability index to the depth to water table.

[1]  L. Connell,et al.  A quantitative approach to aquifer vulnerability mapping , 2003 .

[2]  G. Chae,et al.  Hydrogeochemistry of alluvial groundwaters in an agricultural area: an implication for groundwater contamination susceptibility. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[3]  Olivier Banton,et al.  Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pesticides: A comparison between the pesticide drastic index and the PRZM leaching quantities , 1989 .

[4]  S. Erşahin,et al.  Estimating potential nitrate leaching in nitrogen fertilized and irrigated tomato using the computer model NLEAP , 2001 .

[5]  Bruce K. Wylie,et al.  Identification and mitigation of nitrate leaching hot spots using NLEAP-GIS technology , 1995 .

[6]  K. Lasnik,et al.  NLEAP Internet Tools for Estimating NO 3 -N Leaching and N 2 O Emissions , 2001 .

[7]  Dana W. Kolpin,et al.  Assessing groundwater vulnerability to agrichemical contamination in the Midwest US , 1999 .

[8]  J. Villeneuve,et al.  A probabilistic approach for the groundwater vulnerability to contamination by pesticides: The vulpest model , 1990 .

[9]  G. Malzer,et al.  Nitrogen management and nitrification inhibitor effects on nitrogen-15 urea: II. Nitrogen leaching and balance. , 1990 .

[10]  Jagath J Kaluarachchi,et al.  Aquifer vulnerability assessment to heavy metals using ordinal logistic regression , 2005, Ground water.

[11]  M. Soutter,et al.  Coupling 1D Monte-Carlo simulations and geostatistics to assess groundwater vulnerability to pesticide contamination on a regional scale , 1998 .

[12]  REGIONAL VARIABILITY OF ON-GROUND NITROGEN LOADING DUE TO MULTIPLE LAND USES IN AGRICULTURE-DOMINATED WATERSHEDS , 2003 .

[13]  B. Ruddy,et al.  Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  U. Sunday Tim,et al.  Interactive Modeling of Ground‐Water Vulnerability Within a Geographic Information System Environmenta , 1996 .

[15]  R. Wagenet,et al.  Predicting the fate of nonvolatile pesticides in the unsaturated zone , 1986 .

[16]  M G Rupert,et al.  Calibration of the DRASTIC Ground Water Vulnerability Mapping Method , 2001, Ground water.

[17]  D. Kolpin,et al.  Groundwater vulnerability: interactions of chemical and site properties. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Matthew Lorber,et al.  The Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM): A procedure for evaluating pesticide leaching threats to groundwater , 1985 .

[19]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Large scale modelling of groundwater contamination from nitrate leaching , 1999 .

[20]  Berhanu F. Alemaw,et al.  Assessment of groundwater pollution vulnerability and modelling of the Kanye Wellfield in SE Botswana—a GIS approach , 2004 .

[21]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Screening Procedure for Estimating Potentially Leachable Nitrate-Nitrogen Below the Root Zone , 2015 .

[22]  A. Dassargues,et al.  Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods , 2000 .

[23]  David W. Watkins,et al.  21. Groundwater Pollution Control , 2005, Applications of Stochastic Programming.

[24]  Jagath J. Kaluarachchi,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF ON‐GROUND NITROGEN LOADING AND SOIL TRANSFORMATIONS ON GROUND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT 1 , 2004 .

[25]  Wayne L. Myers,et al.  A GIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC , 1990 .

[26]  Olivier Banton,et al.  A GIS-linked model for the assessment of nitrate contamination in groundwater , 1999 .

[27]  Anat Thapinta,et al.  Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in Central Thailand. , 2003, Environment international.

[28]  A. Olness,et al.  Farming, Fertilizers and the Nitrate Problem , 1993 .

[29]  C. Jordan,et al.  Methods to predict the agricultural contribution to catchment nitrate loads: designation of nitrate vulnerable zones in Northern Ireland , 2005 .

[30]  R. Waskom,et al.  REGIONAL NITRATE LEACHING VARIABILITY: WHAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN NORTHEASTERN COLORADO , 2001 .

[31]  J. Fehér,et al.  Regional estimation of ground water vulnerability to nonpoint sources of agricultural chemicals , 1996 .

[32]  Fred Worrall,et al.  The vulnerability of groundwater to pesticide contamination estimated directly from observations of presence or absence in wells , 2005 .

[33]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Evaluating factors influencing groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution: developing the potential of GIS. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Kumar Chandra Sekhar Navulur Groundwater vulnerability evaluation to nitrate pollution on a regional scale using GIS , 1996 .

[35]  A. Mercado Nitrate and chloride pollution of aquifers: A regional study with the aid of a single‐cell model , 1976 .

[36]  Rida Al-Adamat,et al.  Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC , 2003 .

[37]  Dennis R. Helsel,et al.  Risk of Nitrate in Groundwaters of the United StatesA National Perspective , 1997 .

[38]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  User's documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1996 .

[39]  B. Fobe,et al.  The groundwater vulnerability map for the Flemish region: its principles and uses , 1990 .

[40]  Richard E. Green,et al.  Uncertainty in recharge estimation: impact on groundwater vulnerability assessments for the Pearl Harbor Basin, O'ahu, Hawai'i, U.S.A. , 1996 .

[41]  Tetsuya Hiyama,et al.  A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  C. Ramos,et al.  Linkage of a geographical information system with the gleams model to assess nitrate leaching in agricultural areas. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[43]  B. Wylie,et al.  Regional assessment of NLEAP NO3-N leaching indices , 1995 .

[44]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems , 1987 .

[45]  C. Voss,et al.  SUTRA (Saturated-Unsaturated Transport). A Finite-Element Simulation Model for Saturated-Unsaturated, Fluid-Density-Dependent Ground-Water Flow with Energy Transport or Chemically-Reactive Single-Species Solute Transport. , 1984 .

[46]  David B. Wall,et al.  Benefit‐cost analysis of best management practices implemented to control nitrate contamination of groundwater , 1998 .