A pixel-by-pixel reliability analysis of infrared thermography (IRT) for the detection of subsurface delamination

Abstract This work presents an improved method for characterizing the reliability of Infrared Thermography (IRT) and determining the optimum thermal contrast for the detection of delamination in concrete. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis in conjunction with image processing methods were used to analyze data from a fabricated and in-service bridge decks. Results of the study demonstrated the excellent capability of IRT to discriminate delaminated from sound concrete. This conclusion was reached because the nonparametric estimate of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was larger than 80% with its 95% confidence for each group of images. The optimum thermal contrast range was determined to be 0.6 ∽ 0.8 °C. Accurately defining the actual condition of the test object is critical to implement the proposed analysis method.

[1]  Christopher L. Barnes,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR IN PREDICTING DECK REPAIR QUANTITIES , 2004 .

[2]  Glenn Washer,et al.  Thermographic Imaging of Subsurface Deterioration in Concrete Bridges , 2010 .

[3]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  Delaine Rodrigues-Bigaton,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of infrared thermography in the diagnosis of arthralgia in women with temporomandibular disorder. , 2013, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[5]  Robert J. Connor,et al.  Proposed Guideline for Reliability-Based Bridge Inspection Practices , 2014 .

[6]  Shuhei Hiasa,et al.  Infrared thermography for civil structural assessment: demonstrations with laboratory and field studies , 2016 .

[7]  Charles E Metz,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  C. Nockemann,et al.  Reliability in NDT: ROC study of radiographic weld inspections , 1991 .

[9]  Koji Mitani,et al.  Monitoring concrete bridge decks using infrared thermography with high speed vehicles , 2016 .

[10]  J Candy,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves: An Analysis Tool for Detection Performance , 2013 .

[11]  Naveen Kumar Bolleni.  Environmental effects on subsurface defect detection in concrete structures using infrared thermography , 2009 .

[12]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  ROC dependent event isolation method for image processing based assessment of corroded harbour structures , 2010 .

[13]  Kristopher Attwood.  Selected topics in two and three class ROC analysis , 2012 .

[14]  Benjamin A. Graybeal,et al.  A comparison of nondestructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment , 2003 .

[15]  Ralf Birken,et al.  Determining Ground Penetrating Radar Amplitude Thresholds for the Corrosion State of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks , 2014 .

[16]  Michael Forde,et al.  Application of infrared thermography to the non-destructive testing of concrete and masonry bridges , 2003 .

[17]  Ikhlas Abdel-Qader,et al.  Ground-Penetrating Radar, Chain Drag, and Ground Truth , 2008 .

[18]  Christopher D. Brown,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics curves and related decision measures: A tutorial , 2006 .

[19]  Gilbert Saporta,et al.  Resampling ROC curves , 2007 .

[20]  Dimitri A. Grivas,et al.  How Accurate Is Ground-Penetrating Radar for Bridge Deck Condition Assessment? , 2003 .

[21]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  Nondestructive testing to identify concrete bridge deck deterioration , 2012 .

[22]  Nenad Gucunski,et al.  Multiple Complementary Nondestructive Evaluation Technologies for Condition Assessment of Concrete Bridge Decks , 2010 .