Supporting System-Centered View of Operators Through Ecological Interface Design: Two Experiments on Human-Centered Automation

Human operators faced with an unexpected situation while controlling a complex system can take effective action if they are provided a system-centered view based on Ecological Interface Design (EID). To date there is only limited empirical support for the efficacy of EID in enhancing human-automation interaction. This paper presents results from two studies of EID in human-automation interaction, drawn from different domains, flight simulation and process control. In Experiment 1, use of an integrated display with an emergent perceptual feature was found to eliminate the automation complacency effect in monitoring for engine system malfunctions during a flight simulation task. In Experiment 2, a display with a multi-level representation of the intention of the automated controllers in a process control system was found to improve human-automation collaboration. These studies show that explicit visualization of the functional structure of a human-automation system in the interface supports the system-centered view in operators, thereby enhancing system performance.

[1]  K B Bennett,et al.  Graphical Displays: Implications for Divided Attention, Focused Attention, and Problem Solving , 1992, Human factors.

[2]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency' , 1993 .

[5]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Comparison of Display Requirements Generated Via Hierarchical Task and Abstraction-Decomposition Space Analysis Techniques , 2001 .

[6]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems II: Mediating 'Direct Perception' in Complex Work Domains , 1990 .

[7]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological Interface Design: Progress and Challenges , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[10]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Attention and complacency , 2000 .

[11]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  A Graphical Interface Design for Supporting Human-Machine Cooperation: Representing Automation's Intention by Means-Ends Relations , 2001 .

[13]  R Parasuraman,et al.  AUTOMATION AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE IN AVIATION. IN: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY , 2003 .

[14]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.