Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system

Slow horizontal head and body rotation occurs in mice and rats when the visual field is rotated around them, and these optomotor movements can be produced reliably in a virtual-reality system. If one eye is closed, only motion in the temporal-to-nasal direction for the contralateral eye evokes the tracking response. When the maximal spatial frequency capable of driving the response (“acuity”) was measured under monocular and binocular viewing conditions, the monocular acuity was identical to the binocular acuity measured with the same rotation direction. Thus, the visual capabilities of each eye can be measured under binocular conditions simply by changing the direction of rotation. Lesions of the visual cortex had no effect on the acuities measured with the virtual optokinetic system, whereas perceptual thresholds obtained previously with the Visual Water Task are. The optokinetic acuities were also consistently lower than acuity estimates from the Visual Water Task, but contrast sensitivities were the same or better. These data show that head-tracking in a virtual optokinetic drum is driven by subcortical, lower frequency, and contralateral pathways.

[1]  R. Lund,et al.  Quantification of spatial vision in the Royal College of Surgeons rat. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  M P Stryker,et al.  Experience-Dependent Plasticity of Binocular Responses in the Primary Visual Cortex of the Mouse , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Cowey,et al.  The retinal origin of uncrossed optic nerve fibres in rats and their role in visual discrimination , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Effect of cerebro/cortical and collicular ablations upon the optokinetic reactions in the rabbit , 1971, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[5]  W. Precht,et al.  Functional deficits in the optokinetic system of albino rats , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  R. Blanks,et al.  Nonretinal projections to the medial terminal accessory optic nucleus in rabbit and rat: A retrograde and anterograde transport study , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  M. Seeliger,et al.  Grating acuity at different luminances in wild-type mice and in mice lacking rod or cone function. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  G B Arden,et al.  The Visual System , 2021, AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th Edition, 2021.

[9]  S. Sadda,et al.  Optokinetic test to evaluate visual acuity of each eye independently , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  Glen T Prusky,et al.  Reduced visual acuity impairs place but not cued learning in the Morris water task , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  R. Douglas,et al.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats , 2000, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Douglas,et al.  Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  L. Swanson.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, George Paxinos, Charles Watson (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1982), vii + 153, $35.00, ISBN: 0 125 47620 5 , 1984 .

[14]  P Strata,et al.  The Early Phase of Horizontal Optokinetic Responses in the Pigmented Rat and the Effects of Lesions of the Visual Cortex , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  T. Hattori,et al.  Somatic labeling of the medial terminal nucleus of the accessory optic system with WGA-HRP injected into the rat occipital cortex , 1987, Brain Research Bulletin.

[16]  U. Grüsser-Cornehls,et al.  Horizontal optokinetic ocular nystagmus in wildtype (B6CBA+/+) and weaver mutant mice , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[18]  R M Douglas,et al.  Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  F A Miles,et al.  The neural processing of 3‐D visual information: evidence from eye movements , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  R. Douglas,et al.  Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  R. Douglas,et al.  Characterization of mouse cortical spatial vision , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  K. S. Lashley,et al.  The Mechanism of Vision: I. A Method for Rapid Analysis of Pattern-Vision in the Rat , 1930 .

[23]  M. Bentivoglio,et al.  Independent efferent populations in the nucleus of the optic tract: An anatomical and physiological study in rat and cat , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  L. Maffei,et al.  Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: Dark rearing and monocular deprivation , 1994, Vision Research.

[25]  R. Lund,et al.  Preservation of vision following cell-based therapies in a model of retinal degenerative disease , 2004, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Lund,et al.  Long-term preservation of cortically dependent visual function in RCS rats by transplantation , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  R. Douglas,et al.  Experience‐dependent plasticity of visual acuity in rats , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.