Bone bonding through bioadhesives: present status.

Until recently use of adhesives was confined to cases in which glued areas could be pre-treated or at least cleaned. Thus, grease or oil contaminated surfaces could not be joined together by glueing. More recently, some adhesives have been developed which allow previous treatment of greasy surfaces to be avoided. Among these we find epoxy resins, acrylics and polyurethances. These adhesives have been used until now in various industries. We have begun a research program with these products and in aiming to design an adhesive which would enable immediate and strong bone bonding and avoid problems of metallic fixation, this study is a continuation of our previous research. Thus we tested - currently available surgical and dental adhesives - original mixtures developed in our laboratory. Mechanical assays were performed on bone samples from human femurs in different conditions : dried, cleaned, fresh, or after immersion in physiological solution. They consist essentially of tensile tests on Lhomargy and Zwick's machine wherein the stress is directed perpendicular to the interface. Variations of tensile strength (in h bar) are related to hardening time and to mixture composition. The specimens are joined together either in monolayers or in multilayers. The use of adequate catalysts ensures setting at room temperature. Torsion tests and fatigue tests are carried out concomitantly. Standardized bevel fermoral osteotomies were performed on mice with a dental saw after I.P. Nembutal anesthesia in order to test biological tolerance : - for the control group we study the evolution of bone repair after circumferential wiring - for the animals under test, bones are glued together with one of the proposed adhesives. Radiological and histological studies (using classical Azantrichrome staining after demineralization) are carried out at regular time intervals. In the control animals particular attention is paid to the time course of the formation, constitution and evolution of callus. In the test animals, we can observe callus formation, bone growth into the adhesive material and glue resorption, and look for specific antigenic phenomena. Despite expected improvements, bone glueing remains a challenge and only restricted clinical applications can be proposed.

[1]  D. Leake,et al.  Current experiments in polymeric mandibular implants for bone induction. , 1973, The British journal of oral surgery.

[2]  W. Wake Adhesion and the formulation of adhesives , 1976 .

[3]  J. Salvatore,et al.  Polyurethane polymer; its use in fractured and diseased bones. , 1959, American journal of surgery.

[4]  A. C. Nassif AN ADHESIVE FOR REPAIR OF TISSUES. , 1965, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  R E Baier,et al.  Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it. , 1968, Science.

[6]  M. Urist,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF FIBROCARTILAGINOUS FRACTURE CALLUS. OBSERVATIONS ON TRANSPLANTS LABELLED WITH TRITIATED THYMIDINE. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  M. Williams,et al.  Comparison of the Strength of Barnacle and Commercial Dental Cements , 1973, Journal of dental research.

[8]  F. Thompson,et al.  Polyurethane Polymer: An Experimental Investigation of Its Adjunct Value in the Treatment of Fractures and in Arthrodesis , 1962 .

[9]  I. Redler Polymer Osteosynthesis: A Clinical Trial of Ostamer in Forty-two Patients , 1962 .

[10]  L Linder,et al.  Tissue reaction to methyl methacrylate monomer. A comparative study in the rabbit's ear on the toxicity of methyl methacrylate monomer of varying composition. , 1976, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  J. Vogel,et al.  DETERMINATION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL LENGTH OF A RECONSTRUCTED MUSCLE-TENDON UNIT THROUGH MUSCLE STIMULATION. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J J PRITCHARD,et al.  Comparison of fracture repair in the frog, lizard and rat. , 1950, Journal of anatomy.

[13]  R. Houwink,et al.  Adhesion and adhesives , 1965 .