DMFC employing a porous plate for an efficient operation at high methanol concentrations

Abstract The effect of employing a porous carbon plate on the performance of a passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) under closed circuit conditions was investigated. The porous carbon plate and a CO2 gas layer that formed between the anode and the porous plate stably controlled the mass transfer of the methanol and water from the reservoir to the anode, which made operation with very high concentrations of methanol, even neat methanol, possible. The i–V and i–t performances of the DMFC with and without the porous plate were measured at different methanol concentrations, and the performances were compared. The maximum power density, 24 mW cm−2 at room temperature, obtained at 2 M without the porous plate was reproduced at 16 M with the porous plate. Also, the methanol crossover flux and water flux through the MEA was evaluated, and the Faraday efficiencies of the DMFC with and without the porous carbon plate were analyzed. When high concentrations of methanol were used with the porous plate, it was confirmed that the Faraday efficiency remained high, and the back diffusion of water from the cathode to the anode through the membrane occurred which resulted in no flooding at the cathode, contrary to the case without the porous plate. By increasing the distance between the anode and the porous plate, the power density decreased, suggesting that the distance of the CO2 layer played an important role in obstructing the mass transport.

[1]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Composite Nafion/Zirconium Phosphate Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Operation at High Temperature , 2001 .

[2]  A. Mel'man,et al.  A Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Based on a Novel Low‐Cost Nanoporous Proton‐Conducting Membrane , 1999 .

[3]  K. Richau,et al.  Reduction of Methanol Permeability in Polyetherketone-Heteropolyacid Membranes , 2003 .

[4]  M. Yamaguchi,et al.  Nafion®117 modified by low dose EB irradiation: surface structure and physical properties , 2002 .

[5]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  Comparison of Ethanol and Methanol Oxidation in a Liquid‐Feed Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell at High Temperature , 1999 .

[6]  Masayuki Kunimatsu,et al.  Pt catalyst configuration by a new plating process for a micro tubular DMFC cathode , 2005 .

[7]  Ih. Oh,et al.  Modification of polymer electrolyte membranes for DMFCs using Pd films formed by sputtering , 2002 .

[8]  Subbarao Surampudi,et al.  Advances in direct oxidation methanol fuel cells , 1994 .

[9]  T. Zhao,et al.  A natural-circulation fuel delivery system for direct methanol fuel cells , 2005 .

[10]  M. Barak,et al.  Power Sources 4 , 1974 .

[11]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  DMFCs: From Fundamental Aspects to Technology Development , 2001 .

[12]  Won Choon Choi,et al.  Modification of proton conducting membrane for reducing methanol crossover in a direct-methanol fuel cell , 2001 .

[13]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Recent progress in passive direct methanol fuel cells at KIST , 2004 .

[14]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Performance evaluation of passive DMFC single cells , 2006 .

[15]  Hong Chang,et al.  Materials and processes for small fuel cells , 2002 .

[16]  C. Chen,et al.  Performance of an air-breathing direct methanol fuel cell , 2003 .

[17]  Emanuel Peled,et al.  Water-neutral micro direct-methanol fuel cell (DMFC) for portable applications , 2003 .

[18]  M. Abdelkareem,et al.  Methanol Crossover Controlled by a Porous Carbon Plate as a Support , 2006 .

[19]  Yiding Cao,et al.  A passive fuel delivery system for portable direct methanol fuel cells , 2004 .

[20]  Rong Chen,et al.  Effect of cell orientation on the performance of passive direct methanol fuel cells , 2006 .

[21]  Rong Chen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of a passive-feed DMFC with heat transfer effect , 2005 .

[22]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  The effect of pretreatment methods on the performance of passive DMFCs , 2004 .

[23]  D. Collins,et al.  Power Sources 3 , 1971 .

[24]  Robert F. Savinell,et al.  Real‐Time Mass Spectrometric Study of the Methanol Crossover in a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 1996 .

[25]  Xiangyang Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of methanol crossover in proton-conducting polyphosphazene membranes , 2002 .

[26]  G. Fedder,et al.  Micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS)-based micro-scale direct methanol fuel cell development , 2006 .

[27]  Rong Chen,et al.  Effect of membrane thickness on the performance and efficiency of passive direct methanol fuel cells , 2006 .

[28]  S. Nakao,et al.  A Pore-Filling Electrolyte Membrane-Electrode Integrated System for a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Application , 2002 .

[29]  P. Pickup,et al.  Modification of Nafion Proton Exchange Membranes to Reduce Methanol Crossover in PEM Fuel Cells , 1999 .

[30]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Current Status of and Recent Developments in the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 2001 .

[31]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Development and characterization of a silicon-based micro direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[32]  Rong Chen,et al.  The effect of methanol concentration on the performance of a passive DMFC , 2005 .

[33]  Toshiyuki Momma,et al.  Design and fabrication of pumpless small direct methanol fuel cells for portable applications , 2004 .

[34]  Musuwathi Krishnamoorthy Ravikumar,et al.  Effect of Methanol Crossover in a Liquid‐Feed Polymer‐Electrolyte Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 1996 .

[35]  Qin Xin,et al.  Study of sintered stainless steel fiber felt as gas diffusion backing in air-breathing DMFC , 2004 .