Strategic orientation and information technological turbulence: Contingency perspective in SMEs

Purpose – There is an emerging recognition in the strategy field that differences in organization forms represent firms’ capability to gain benefit from investing in technology. This study has intention to add to this stream of research by proposing the technological turbulence (TT) as a primary contingency factor focussing on strategic orientation (SO) as main determinant of firm performance (FP). The purpose of this paper is to provide considerable suggestion on how to match SO with various level of TT. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses quantitative approach with structural equation model to understand the moderating effect of information TT on the relationship between SO and FP. The 390 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia contributes to the research as randomly selected respondents. Findings – The result shows how the TT influences managerial decision-making processes under an opportunity-based paradigm. However, SME managers face lack of capability to deal with high TT. Resear...

[1]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Complementary Assets as Pipes and Prisms: Innovation Incentives and Trajectory Choices , 2012 .

[3]  S. Fang,et al.  The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between network structures and the innovative performance of a new venture , 2012 .

[4]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments , 2013 .

[5]  Retha Wiesner,et al.  Strategic approaches in Australian SMEs: Deliberate or emergent? , 2012 .

[6]  J. Lindström A model to explain a business contingency process , 2012 .

[7]  Patrick G. Maggitti,et al.  Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity , 2009 .

[8]  D. Kruse,et al.  Group incentives and financial performance: the moderating role of innovation , 2014 .

[9]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Group-Buying Deal Popularity , 2014 .

[10]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Swinging a Double-Edged Sword: The Effect of Slack on Entrepreneurial Management and Growth , 2011 .

[11]  M. Reitzig,et al.  What’s ‘New’ About New Forms of Organizing? , 2013 .

[12]  R. Mahmood,et al.  Mediating effect of marketing capability and reward philosophy in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance , 2015, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research.

[13]  N Celly,et al.  Rethinking the effectiveness of asset and cost retrenchment: The contingency effects of a firm's rent creation mechanism , 2013 .

[14]  Marco D. Huesch,et al.  Are there always synergies between productive resources and resource deployment capabilities , 2013 .

[15]  R. V. Krejcie,et al.  Determining Sample Size for Research Activities , 1970 .

[16]  C. Rammer,et al.  Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management , 2014 .

[17]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Marketing Performance Measurement Systems: Does Comprehensiveness Really Improve Performance? , 2012 .

[18]  P. M. Garcia-Villaverde,et al.  Environmental dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation , 2013 .

[19]  Gülruh Gürbüz,et al.  Entrepreneurial management, entrepreneurial orientation and Turkish small firm growth , 2009 .

[20]  Jing Zhang,et al.  The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers , 2010 .

[21]  Frank Wiengarten,et al.  Towards a Contingency Resource-Based View of IT Business Value , 2011 .

[22]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[23]  S. Sundqvist,et al.  Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurial‐oriented behavior in turbulent export markets , 2012 .

[24]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity , 2012 .

[25]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Bridging Western management theories and Japanese management practices: case of the Toyota Way model , 2011 .

[26]  M. Palmer,et al.  The relationship between small business market orientation and environmental uncertainty , 2012 .

[27]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation , 1995 .

[28]  G. Lumpkin,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct , 2011 .

[29]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[30]  William J. Wales,et al.  Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research , 2013 .

[31]  Reginald L. Bell,et al.  The Relevance of Scientific Management and Equity Theory in Everyday Managerial Communication Situations , 2012 .

[32]  J. Morecroft,et al.  Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm , 2010 .

[33]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[34]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Toward a Theory of Familiness: A Social Capital Perspective , 2008 .

[35]  A. Laakkonen,et al.  Entrepreneurial leadership and familiness as resources for strategic entrepreneurship , 2012 .

[36]  Entrepreneurship and the innovative self: a Schumpeterian reflection , 2010 .

[37]  Jonathan Bundy,et al.  Strategic Cognition and Issue Salience: Toward an Explanation of Firm Responsiveness to Stakeholder Concerns , 2013 .

[38]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[39]  Oliver Schilke On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism , 2014 .

[40]  A. Cui Portfolio Dynamics and Alliance Termination: The Contingent Role of Resource Dissimilarity , 2013 .

[41]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[42]  Pieter-Jan Bezemer,et al.  The changing role of the supervisory board chairman: the case of the Netherlands (1997–2007) , 2012 .

[43]  Jokull Johannesson,et al.  Environmental turbulence and the success of a firm's intelligence strategy: development of research instruments , 2010 .

[44]  Harri Laihonen,et al.  A contingency approach to performance measurement in service operations , 2012 .

[45]  Philipp Sieger,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms , 2012 .

[46]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[47]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Dynamic Effects of Social Influence and Direct Marketing on the Adoption of High-Technology Products , 2014 .

[48]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models. An Illustration of Available Procedures , 2005 .

[49]  Ting Chi,et al.  Development of firm export market oriented behavior: Evidence from an emerging economy , 2013 .

[50]  Scott D. Swain,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Orientation, and the Job Performance of Frontline Employees , 2013 .

[51]  Robert P. Leone,et al.  Is Market Orientation a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost of Competing , 2011 .