Whether for using online services or dealing with legal issues, citizens are often requested to sign/accept policy documents that are intended to commit them to specific rights and duties. Usually such documents are difficult to read due to their nature, the length of sentences, complex terms used, etc. Since understanding is a prerequisite to making an informed decision, it is important to assess whether citizens, on average, would have the ability to comprehend those texts. We consider here that the authors of those documents should keep in mind their target audience and tailor their texts to their profiles. A good indicator that can be used in this context is the average education level of the citizens of a country. On the other hand, readability measures/scores of texts have been used to assess if educational material is suitable for the intended students' level of education attainment. In this paper, we use this information to assess the readability of terms of use of online services and correlate this information with the education attainment of the countries of their target audience. Our analysis shows that more efforts need to be put into making such policy documents understandable by a broader audience, uncovering a need for standards and tools in this area.
[1]
G. Harry McLaughlin,et al.
SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula.
,
1969
.
[2]
M. Wogalter,et al.
The Understandability of Legal Documents: Are they Adequate?
,
1994
.
[3]
R. Gunning.
The Fog Index After Twenty Years
,
1969
.
[4]
Ftc Staff,et al.
Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change–A Proposed Framework for Businesses and Policymakers
,
2011
.
[5]
Thomas M. Duffy.
Readability Formulas: What's the Use?
,
1985
.
[6]
Sukomal Pal,et al.
Text summarization from legal documents: a survey
,
2019,
Artificial Intelligence Review.
[7]
R. Flesch.
A new readability yardstick.
,
1948,
The Journal of applied psychology.
[8]
D. Dyson,et al.
Access to Justice: The Readability of Legal Services Corporation Legal Aid Internet Services
,
2017
.