Differences in Architects and Nonarchitects' Perception of Urban Design: An Application of Kansei Engineering Techniques

We analyse architects and nonarchitects' emotional assessments of different districts in their own city (Valencia, Spain) by applying Kansei engineering techniques. A field study was carried out on a sample of 140 subjects (70 architects and 70 nonarchitects) who were asked to express their opinions on different areas in the city. The set of emotional impressions used by architects and non-architects to describe their sensations was obtained using differential semantics. The semantic space was described by 9 independent axis which explained 62% of the variability. Then, for each collective the set of impressions which influence the final residential or investment area decision was analysed. This relationship was obtained applying linear regression models. The results showed no significant differences between both groups so that the emotional attributes determining the choice of area were very similar for architects and non-architects. Greater discrepancies were found when the purpose of the choice was investment and not residential. Finally a neighbourhood was semantically profiled to represent and compare both collectives' perceptions.

[1]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  A Theory of Good City Form , 1981 .

[2]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[3]  B. Flury Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models , 1988 .

[4]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[5]  Kemal Yıldırım,et al.  Architecture and engineering students' evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness , 2009 .

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  The evaluative image of the city , 1997 .

[8]  K. Devlin,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION: ARCHITECTS VERSUS NON-ARCHITECTS , 1990 .

[9]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[10]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  A psychological conceptualization of residential choice and satisfaction , 2001 .

[11]  Yukihiro Matsubara,et al.  Hybrid Kansei engineering system and design support , 1997 .

[12]  Donald W. Hine,et al.  Why Architects and Laypersons Judge Buildings Differently: Cognitive Properties and Physical Bases , 2002 .

[13]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Public Preferences for High Rise Buildings: Stylistic and Demographic Effects , 1991 .

[14]  L. Groat,et al.  Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task , 1982 .

[15]  J. E. Jackson,et al.  Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods: Theory and Applications , 1995 .

[16]  Donald W. Hine,et al.  Decoding Modern Architecture , 2000 .

[17]  A. T. Purcell,et al.  The relationship between buildings and behaviour , 1987 .

[18]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Tomio Jindo,et al.  Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering , 1997 .

[20]  D. Streiner Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[21]  Rikard Küller Architecture and emotions , 1980 .

[22]  T. Gärling,et al.  Environment, cognition, and action : an integrated approach , 1991 .

[23]  E. Brunswik Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[24]  Yukihiro Matsubara,et al.  An analysis of Kansei structure on shoes using self-organizing neural networks , 1997 .

[25]  Álvaro Page,et al.  Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment , 2007 .

[26]  Clara H. Mulder,et al.  Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches , 1996 .

[27]  Michael Duffy,et al.  Preferences in Nursing Home Design , 1986 .

[28]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  W. C. Mcginnis Ideals , 1925, Free Speech.

[30]  松原 行宏,et al.  感性工学(Kansei Engineering) , 1998 .

[31]  Yukihiro Matsubara,et al.  Hybrid kansei engineering system and design support , 1997 .

[32]  Carmen Llinares,et al.  Differential semantics as a Kansei Engineering tool for analysing the emotional impressions which determine the choice of neighbourhood: The case of Valencia, Spain , 2008 .

[33]  J. Nasar Environmental aesthetics: Perception and evaluation of residential street scenes , 1988 .

[34]  Rikard Küller,et al.  Environmental assessment from a neuropsychological perspective , 1991 .

[35]  Clara H. Mulder,et al.  The geography of residential choice , 2002 .

[36]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Development of a design support system for office chairs using 3-D graphics , 1995 .

[37]  Ingrid Gould Ellen,et al.  Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence , 1997 .

[38]  Tomio Jindo,et al.  A fuzzy logic analysis method for evaluating human sensitivities , 1995 .

[39]  R. Kaplan The role of nature in the urban context. , 1983 .

[40]  J. Nasar,et al.  The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same , 1989 .

[41]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Experiencing other people's houses: a model of similarities and differences in environmental experience , 1992 .

[42]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  A cognitive analysis of preference for urban spaces , 1992 .

[43]  John Terninko,et al.  Step by Step Qfd: Customer Driven Product Design , 1997 .

[44]  Frederick D. Jarvis Site Planning and Community Design for Great Neighborhoods , 1993 .

[45]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[46]  Clare Cooper Marcus,et al.  Evaluating Evaluation: Analysis of a Housing Design Awards Program , 1986 .