Measuring network reliability and repairability against cascading failures

Cascading failures on techno-socio-economic systems can have dramatic and catastrophic implications in society. A damage caused by a cascading failure, such as a power blackout, is complex to predict, understand, prevent and mitigate as such complex phenomena are usually a result of an interplay between structural and functional non-linear dynamics. Therefore, systematic and generic measurements of network reliability and repairability against cascading failures is of a paramount importance to build a more sustainable and resilient society. This paper contributes a probabilistic framework for measuring network reliability and repairability against cascading failures. In contrast to related work, the framework is designed on the basis that network reliability is multifaceted and therefore a single metric cannot adequately characterize it. The concept of ‘repairability envelope’ is introduced that illustrates trajectories of performance improvement and trade-offs for countermeasures against cascading failures. The framework is illustrated via four model-independent and application-independent metrics that characterize the topological damage, the network spread of the cascading failure, the evolution of its propagation, the correlation of different cascading failure outbreaks and other aspects by using probability density functions and cumulative distribution functions. The applicability of the framework is experimentally evaluated in a theoretical model of damage spread and an empirical one of power cascading failures. It is shown that the reliability and repairability in two systems of a totally different nature undergoing cascading failures can be better understood by the same generic measurements of the proposed framework.

[1]  Dorian Mazauric,et al.  Computational analysis of cascading failures in power networks , 2013, SIGMETRICS '13.

[2]  Shizhao Zhou,et al.  Internet, Open-source and Power System Simulation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[3]  Wei Pei,et al.  An efficient method of robustness analysis for power grid under cascading failure , 2014 .

[4]  Michael T. Todinov Flow Networks: Analysis and optimization of repairable flow networks, networks with disturbed flows, static flow networks and reliability networks , 2013 .

[5]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Massive contingency analysis with high performance computing , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[6]  Haibo He,et al.  Integrated Security Analysis on Cascading Failure in Complex Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[7]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Internet of Things and Inter-cooperative Computational Technologies for Collective Intelligence , 2012, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[8]  Ganesh K. Venayagamoorthy,et al.  Cellular neural network based situational awareness system for power grids , 2013, The 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[9]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Self-Repairable Smart Grids Via Online Coordination of Smart Transformers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[10]  Xiaoyan Zhu,et al.  Some Recent Advances on Importance Measures in Reliability , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[11]  K. Tomsovic Integrated Security Analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Bent Natvig,et al.  Discrete event simulation methods applied to advanced importance measures of repairable components in multistate network flow systems , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Robustness envelopes of networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[14]  Zhijun Qin,et al.  Construction of generic and adaptive restoration strategies , 2015 .

[15]  Janghoon Kim,et al.  Testing Branching Process Estimators of Cascading Failure with Data from a Simulation of Transmission Line Outages , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Hui Ren,et al.  Branching Process based Cascading Failure Probability Analysis for a Regional Power Grid in China with Utility Outage Data , 2013 .

[17]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  A network approach for power grid robustness against cascading failures , 2015, 2015 7th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM).

[18]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Universal robustness characteristic of weighted networks against cascading failure. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory , 2009 .

[20]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Organizational Control Reconfigurations for a Robust Smart Power Grid , 2013, Internet of Things and Inter-cooperative Computational Technologies for Collective Intelligence.

[21]  Sakshi Pahwa,et al.  Robustness measure for power grids with respect to cascading failures , 2011, Cnet@ITC.

[22]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Efficient response to cascading disaster spreading. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Criticality in a cascading failure blackout model , 2006 .

[24]  Benjamin A Carreras,et al.  Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. , 2007, Chaos.

[25]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Multi-level Reconfigurable Self-organization in Overlay Services , 2013 .

[26]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  SFINA - Simulation Framework for Intelligent Network Adaptations , 2017, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.