Pairwise interaction processes for modeling cellular network topology

In industry, cellular tower locations have primarily been modeled by a deterministic hexagonal grid. Since real deployments are rarely regular, the even spacing between nodes in the grid and constant Voronoi cell areas make the hexagonal grid unrealistic. In this paper we use tools from spatial statistics to show that a purely random node placement and a hexagonal grid distribution with the points perturbed also have unrealistic spatial relationships between nodes, and that pairwise interactions between nodes are necessary, and in most cases sufficient, for modeling spatial qualities of cellular networks. We detail the benefits of using pairwise point interactions in modeling both a coverage-centric tower deployment and a capacity-centric tower deployment. We propose using pairwise and saturated pairwise interaction point processes from the Gibbs process family of point processes: the Strauss Hardcore process for inhibitive point patterns and the Geyer Saturation process for clustered point patterns. Due to its relationship with the coverage areas, we also propose that the Voronoi cell area distribution can be used as a test statistic in general spatial modeling of cellular networks.

[1]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A tractable framework for coverage and outage in heterogeneous cellular networks , 2011, 2011 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[2]  D. J. Strauss A model for clustering , 1975 .

[3]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of K-Tier Downlink Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Janne Riihijarvi,et al.  Modeling Spatial Structure of Wireless Communication Networks , 2010, 2010 INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops.

[5]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes , 2005 .

[6]  M. Tanemura Statistical Distributions of Poisson Voronoi Cells in Two and Three Dimensions , 2003 .

[7]  Hsuan-Jung Su,et al.  LTE-Advanced heterogeneous networks: Release 10 and beyond , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[8]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[9]  R. Waagepetersen,et al.  Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes * , 2007 .

[10]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[11]  Timothy X. Brown,et al.  Cellular performance bounds via shotgun cellular systems , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  F. Kelly,et al.  A note on Strauss's model for clustering , 1976 .

[13]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Impact of Base Station Locations and Antenna Orientations on UMTS Radio Network Capacity and Coverage Evolution , 2003 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  A. Baddeley,et al.  A non-parametric measure of spatial interaction in point patterns , 1996, Advances in Applied Probability.

[16]  Jussi Turkka,et al.  Non-regular layout for cellular network system simulations , 2010, 21st Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[17]  Pei Liu,et al.  The urge to merge: When cellular service providers pool capacity , 2011, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).