Practical Concerns Associated with Single-Number Ratings in Measuring Sound Transmission Loss Properties of Partition Panels

The paper presents an extensive review investigating the practical aspects related to the use of single- number ratings used in describing the sound insulation performance of partition wall panels and practical complications encountered in precise measurements in extensive frequency range from 50 Hz to 5 kHz. SWOT analysis of various single number ratings is described. A laboratory investigation on a double wall partition panel combination revealed the significant dependence of STC rating on transmission loss at 125 Hz attributed to 8 dB rule. An investigation conducted on devising alternative spectrums of aircraft noise, traffic noise, vehicular horn noise and elevated metro train noise as an extension to ISO 717-1 Ctr for ascertaining the sound insulation properties of materials exclusively towards these noise sources revealed that the single-number rating Rw + Ctr calculated using ISO 717-1 Ctr gives the minimum sound insulation, when compared with Rw + Cx calculated using the alternative spectrums of aircraft noise, traffic noise, etc., which means that material provides a higher sound insulation to the other noise sources. It is also observed that spectrum adaptation term Cx calculated using the spectrum of noise sources having high sound pressure levels in lower frequencies decreases as compared to ISO 717-1 Ctr owing to significant dependence of Ctr at lower frequencies.

[1]  Matthew J. Patterson.  RECENT CHANGES TO THE SOUND INSULATION PROVISIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE OF AUSTRALIA , 2004 .

[2]  A.C.C. Warnock,et al.  Forward and reverse transmission loss measurements , 2004 .

[3]  Werner Scholl,et al.  Rating of Sound Insulation at Present and in Future. The Revision of ISO 717 , 2011 .

[4]  H. Nélisse,et al.  Characterization of a diffuse field in a reverberant room , 1997 .

[5]  R. K. Cook,et al.  Measurement of Correlation Coefficients in Reverberant Sound Fields , 1955 .

[6]  Volker Wittstock,et al.  Does it matter whether single-number values of sound reduction indices are evaluated from third-octave band values or from octave band values? , 2012 .

[7]  D. M. Clark.  Subjective study of the sound-transmission class system for rating building partitions. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Volker Wittstock,et al.  On the uncertainty of single-number quantities for rating airborne sound insulation , 2007 .

[9]  Cinzia Buratti,et al.  SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCES OF WINDOWS: EVALUATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TRAFFIC NOISE SPECTRA IN LABORATORY AND FIELD MEASUREMENT , 2010 .

[10]  Gerrit Vermeir,et al.  Low-frequency airborne sound transmission through single partitions in buildings , 1997 .

[11]  Hideki Tachibana,et al.  Loudness evaluation of sounds transmitted through walls—basic experiment with artificial sounds , 1988 .

[12]  M. Schroeder.  The ‘‘Schroeder frequency’’ revisited , 1996 .

[13]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Measures for assessing architectural speech security (privacy) of closed offices and meeting rooms. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Teresa Bravo,et al.  Variability of low frequency sound transmission measurements , 2004 .

[15]  Omkar Sharma,et al.  Experimental investigations on sound insulation through single, double & triple window glazing for traffic noise abatement , 2011 .

[16]  Robin Mackenzie,et al.  The implications of ISO 717 spectrum adaption terms for residential dwellings. , 2001 .

[17]  Jens Holger Rindel.  On the influence of low frequencies on the annoyance of noise from neighbours , 2003 .

[18]  M. Schroeder.  Frequency‐Correlation Functions of Frequency Responses in Rooms , 1962 .

[19]  John L. Davy.  Insulating buildings against transportation noise , 2004 .

[20]  William F. Danner,et al.  Assessment of significant acoustical parameters for rating sound insulation of party walls , 1983 .

[21]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Evaluating airborne sound insulation in terms of speech intelligibility. , 2008, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Birgit Rasmussen,et al.  Sound insulation between dwellings – Descriptors applied in building regulations in Europe , 2010 .

[24]  C. G. Balachandran,et al.  Random Sound Field in Reverberation Chambers , 1959 .

[25]  Moretti,et al.  Traffic Noise Pollution: Spectra Characteristics and Windows Sound Insulation in Laboratory and Field Measurements , 2010 .

[26]  B. Gibbs,et al.  Application of a finite-element model to low-frequency sound insulation in dwellings. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Lang,et al.  A round robin on sound insulation in buildings , 1997 .

[28]  Birgit Rasmussen,et al.  Sound insulation between dwellings – Requirements in building regulations in Europe , 2010 .