A Randomized Controlled Study of Silver-Based Burns Dressing in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Silver-impregnated dressings are increasingly preferred over silver sulfadiazine cream in the management of pediatric burns. An ideal burns dressing would provide a moist, sterile environment, discourage infection, and not require painful dressing changes. This study sought to determine whether silver sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Aquacel® Ag, ConvaTec, Greensboro, NC) dressing is a superior treatment to nanocrystalline silver-coated polyethylene (Acticoat™, Smith & Nephew, London, United Kingdom) dressing in pediatric patients with partial thickness burns. The authors conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial in 89 patients presenting to Starship Children’s Emergency Department with uncomplicated partial-thickness burns. Patients were randomized to receive either an Acticoat™ (n = 45) or Aquacel® Ag (n = 44) dressing. Photographs of the burn before dressing and at day 10 were assessed by two blinded pediatric burn surgeons to determine the primary outcome and percentage epithelialization. Secondary outcomes were number of dressing changes required and number and type of adverse events. Both treatment groups achieved satisfactory rates of burn healing. There was no difference between groups in the percentage epithelialization at day 10 (Acticoat™ [mean ± SD] = 93 ± 14%; Aquacel® Ag = 94 ± 17%, P = .89). Adverse events such as infection and escalation of care were rare, with no difference detected between groups. Compared with Acticoat™, Aquacel® Ag dressings required significantly less dressing changes per patient {Acticoat™ [median (interquartile range)] = 2 (2–2), Aquacel® Ag=1 (1–1), P = .03}. Both Acticoat™ and Aquacel® Ag dressings are effective burn dressings, allowing reepithelialization and preventing infection in a subset of uncomplicated partial-thickness burns in pediatric patients. Aquacel® Ag requires fewer dressing changes. This decrease in frequency of dressing changes and direct manipulation of the wound, which can be distressing or require additional intervention, identified Aquacel® Ag as the superior dressing. The majority of partial thickness pediatric burns heal within 10 days; however, a considerable minority requires the wound to be dressed for a longer period of time and/or specialist intervention. To identify these patients, expert review of the wound at 10 days postburn is recommended.

[1]  R. Cartotto Topical antimicrobial agents for pediatric burns , 2017, Burns & Trauma.

[2]  J. Dumville,et al.  Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Carlos J. Maldonado,et al.  Efficacy of medical grade honey against multidrug-resistant organisms of operational significance: Part I , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[4]  H. Hoeksema,et al.  Aquacel(®) Ag dressing versus Acticoat™ dressing in partial thickness burns: a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 patients. Part 1: burn wound healing. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[5]  E. Middelkoop,et al.  Optimal treatment of partial thickness burns in children: a systematic review. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[6]  K. Enskär,et al.  Children's experiences of procedural pain management in conjunction with trauma wound dressings. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  P. Muangman,et al.  A prospective, randomized trial of silver containing hydrofiber dressing versus 1% silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns , 2010, International wound journal.

[8]  Moustapha Hamdi,et al.  Accuracy of early burn depth assessment by laser Doppler imaging on different days post burn. , 2009, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[9]  Phillip Blondeel,et al.  Assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential. , 2008, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[10]  A. Rodgers,et al.  Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Evangelia Vlachou,et al.  The safety of nanocrystalline silver dressings on burns: a study of systemic silver absorption. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[12]  R. Kimble,et al.  A retrospective cohort study of Acticoat versus Silvazine in a paediatric population. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[13]  C. Camargo,et al.  National Study of Emergency Department Visits for Burn Injuries, 1993 to 2004 , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[14]  J. Jeng,et al.  National Burn Repository 2006: A Ten-Year Review , 2007, Journal of Burn Care & Research.

[15]  S. Coulling Fundamentals of pain management in wound care. , 2007, British journal of nursing.

[16]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Silver Impregnated Antimicrobial Dressing Reduces Hospital Length of Stay for Pediatric Patients With Burns , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[17]  Xuesheng Liu,et al.  A randomized comparative trial between Acticoat and SD-Ag in the treatment of residual burn wounds, including safety analysis. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[18]  S. Silver,et al.  Silver as biocides in burn and wound dressings and bacterial resistance to silver compounds , 2006, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[19]  D. Herndon,et al.  Randomized Clinical Study of Hydrofiber Dressing With Silver or Silver Sulfadiazine in the Management of Partial-Thickness Burns , 2006, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[20]  F. Tay,et al.  Role of Silver Ions in Destabilization of Intermolecular Adhesion Forces Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy in Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms , 2005, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  N. Namias,et al.  A prospective, randomized trial of Acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns: which method is less painful? , 2005, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[22]  Susan C. Taylor,et al.  Topical antimicrobial agents in dermatology. , 2004, Disease-a-month : DM.

[23]  J. Bryan,et al.  Moist wound healing: a concept that changed our practice. , 2004, Journal of wound care.

[24]  P. Bowler,et al.  Controlling wound bioburden with a novel silver‐containing Hydrofiber® dressing , 2004, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[25]  K. Foster,et al.  Aquacel Ag in the management of partial-thickness burns: results of a clinical trial. , 2004, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[26]  D. Herndon,et al.  Current pharmacotherapy for the treatment of severe burns , 2003, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.