An electronic order set for acute myocardial infarction is associated with improved patient outcomes through better adherence to clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND Adherence to evidence-based recommendations for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE Quantifying association between using an electronic AMI order set (AMI-OS) and hospital processes and outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Twenty-one community hospitals. PATIENTS A total of 5879 AMI patients were hospitalized between September 28, 2008 and December 31, 2010. MEASUREMENTS We ascertained whether patients were treated using the AMI-OS or individual orders (a la carte). Dependent process variables were use of evidence-based care; outcome variables were mortality and rehospitalization. RESULTS Use of individual and combined therapies improved outcomes (eg, 50% lower odds of 30-day mortality for patients with ≥3 therapies). The 3531 patients treated using the AMI-OS were more likely to receive evidence-based therapies (eg, 50% received 5 different therapies vs 36% a la carte). These patients had lower 30-day mortality (5.7% vs 8.5%) than the 2348 treated using a la carte orders. Although AMI-OS patients' predicted mortality risk was lower (3.2%) than that of a la carte patients (4.8%), the association of improved processes and outcomes with the use of the AMI-OS persisted after risk adjustment. For example, after inverse probability weighting, the relative risk for inpatient mortality in the AMI-OS group was 0.67 (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.86). Inclusion of use of recommended therapies in risk adjustment eliminated the benefit of the AMI-OS, highlighting its mediating effect on adherence to evidence-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS Use of an electronic order set is associated with increased adherence to evidence-based care and better AMI outcomes.

[1]  P. Rosenbaum.  Discussing hidden bias in observational studies. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[2]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Derivation and Validation of a Model to Predict Daily Risk of Death in Hospital , 2011, Medical care.

[3]  C. Yancy,et al.  Impact of a standardized heart failure order set on mortality, readmission, and quality and costs of care. , 2010, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[4]  Patricia Kipnis,et al.  Risk-adjusting Hospital Mortality Using a Comprehensive Electronic Record in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System , 2013, Medical care.

[5]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Association of changes in clinical characteristics and management with improvement in survival among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, JAMA.

[6]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors are not Always Observed , 1994 .

[7]  Vincent Liu,et al.  Adverse outcomes associated with delayed intensive care unit transfers in an integrated healthcare system. , 2012, Journal of hospital medicine.

[8]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  The Kaiser Permanente inpatient risk adjustment methodology was valid in an external patient population. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  G. Escobar,et al.  Length of Stay Predictions: Improvements Through the Use of Automated Laboratory and Comorbidity Variables , 2010, Medical care.

[10]  Jerod M Loeb,et al.  Quality of Care in U . S . Hospitals as Reflected by Standardized Measures , 2002 – 2004 , 2005 .

[11]  P. Rosenbaum.  Design of Observational Studies , 2009, Springer Series in Statistics.

[12]  J. Selby,et al.  Linking Automated Databases for Research in Managed Care Settings , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  B. Gersh.  Association Between Adoption of Evidence-Based Treatment and Survival for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2012 .

[14]  W. Ettinger.  Using health information technology to improve health care: emphasizing speed to value. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Changes in myocardial infarction guideline adherence as a function of patient risk: an end to paradoxical care? , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  R. D'Agostino.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Gabriel J. Escobar,et al.  Effect of Choice of Estimation Method on Inter-Hospital Mortality Rate Comparisons , 2010, Medical care.

[18]  D. Mackinnon.  Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Wuwei Wayne Feng,et al.  A Method/Macro Based on Propensity Score and Mahalanobis Distance to Reduce Bias in Treatment Comparisonin Observational Study , 2006 .

[20]  Christopher E. Buller,et al.  2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Gabriel J. Escobar,et al.  Risk-Adjusting Hospital Inpatient Mortality Using Automated Inpatient, Outpatient, and Laboratory Databases , 2008, Medical care.

[22]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Biao Xing,et al.  Re‐estimating the sample size of an on‐going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Yuchiao Chang,et al.  Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well do randomized trials translate into clinical practice? , 2003, JAMA.

[25]  Alan S. Go,et al.  Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  P. Austin.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2012, Circulation.

[28]  Patricia Kipnis,et al.  Early detection of impending physiologic deterioration among patients who are not in intensive care: development of predictive models using data from an automated electronic medical record. , 2012, Journal of hospital medicine.

[29]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patie , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Jerod M. Loeb,et al.  Quality of Care in U.S. Hospitals as Reflected by Standardized Measures, 2002-2004 , 2005 .

[31]  Patricia Kipnis,et al.  Intra-hospital transfers to a higher level of care: contribution to total hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and length of stay (LOS). , 2011, Journal of hospital medicine.

[32]  Robert Parrish,et al.  Guideline-based standardized care is associated with substantially lower mortality in medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Projects in Michigan. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  A. Folsom,et al.  Twenty-Two–Year Trends in Incidence of Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Heart Disease Mortality, and Case Fatality in 4 US Communities, 1987–2008 , 2012, Circulation.

[34]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.