A Survey of University Students' Preferences for Midwifery Care and Community Birth Options in 8 High-Income Countries.

INTRODUCTION Midwifery care is associated with positive birth outcomes, access to community birth options, and judicious use of interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare maternity care preferences of university students across a range of maternity care systems and to explore whether preferences align with evidence-based recommendations and options available. METHODS A cross-sectional, web-based survey was completed in 2014 and 2015 by a convenience sample of university students in 8 high-income countries across 4 continents (N = 4569). In addition to describing preferences for midwifery care and community birth options across countries, this study examined sociodemographic characteristics, psychological factors, knowledge about pregnancy and birth, and sources of information that shaped students' attitudes toward birth in relation to preferences for midwifery care and community birth options. RESULTS Approximately half of the student respondents (48.2%) preferred midwifery-led care for a healthy pregnancy; 9.5% would choose to give birth in a birthing center, and 4.5% preferred a home birth. Preference for midwifery care varied from 10.3% among women in the United States to 78.6% among women in the United Kingdom. Preferences for home birth varied from 0.3% among US women to 18.3% among Canadian women. Women, health science students, those with low childbirth fear, those who learned about pregnancy and birth from friends (compared with other sources, eg, the media), and those who responded from Europe were significantly more likely to prefer midwifery care and community birth. High confidence in knowledge of pregnancy and birth was linked to significantly higher odds of community birth preferences and midwifery care preferences. DISCUSSION It would be beneficial to integrate childbirth education into high school curricula to promote knowledge of midwifery care, pregnancy, and childbirth and to reduce fear among prospective parents. Community birth options need to be expanded to meet demand among the next generation of maternity service users.

[1]  H. Krowchuk,et al.  Toward Evidence-Based Practice. , 2019, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[2]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2017. , 2018, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[3]  Timothy Fisher,et al.  Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  M. Gross,et al.  Intrapartum Care Working Patterns of Midwives: The Long Road to Models of Care in Germany , 2018, Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie.

[5]  D. Payne,et al.  Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education , 2017, Reproductive Health.

[6]  M. Gross,et al.  Opting for natural birth: A survey of birth intentions among young Icelandic women. , 2017, Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives.

[7]  G. Thomson,et al.  Negative impressions of childbirth in a North-West England student population , 2017, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  Y. Hauck,et al.  Association between childbirth attitudes and fear on birth preferences of a future generation of Australian parents. , 2016, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[9]  Neel T Shah,et al.  Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care? , 2016, The Lancet.

[10]  I. Morhason-Bello,et al.  Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide , 2016, The Lancet.

[11]  Y. Hauck,et al.  Cross-cultural development and psychometric evaluation of a measure to assess fear of childbirth prior to pregnancy. , 2016, Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives.

[12]  A. Gilkison,et al.  Midwifery education in New Zealand: Education, practice and autonomy. , 2016, Midwifery.

[13]  Berglind Hálfdánsdóttir,et al.  Home birth constructed as a safe choice in Iceland: A content analysis on Icelandic media. , 2015, Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives.

[14]  K. Stoll,et al.  Fear of Childbirth and Preference for Cesarean Delivery Among Young American Women Before Childbirth: A Survey Study. , 2015, Birth.

[15]  A. Malata,et al.  Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care , 2014, The Lancet.

[16]  S. Vedam,et al.  Home birth in North America: attitudes and practice of US certified nurse-midwives and Canadian registered midwives. , 2014, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[17]  K. Stoll,et al.  Attitudes and Preferences of Young Women With Low and High Fear of Childbirth , 2013, Qualitative health research.

[18]  G. Cavada,et al.  Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile. , 2013, Midwifery.

[19]  I. Lundgren,et al.  A midwifery model of woman-centred childbirth care--in Swedish and Icelandic settings. , 2012, Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives.

[20]  F. Gallagher,et al.  Requesting cesareans without medical indications: an option being considered by young canadian women. , 2012, Birth.

[21]  S. DeJoy.  "Midwives are nice, but . . .": perceptions of midwifery and childbirth in an undergraduate class. , 2010, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[22]  E. Carty,et al.  "It's all the rage these days": University students' attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean birth. , 2009, Birth.

[23]  E. Sobo,et al.  Paternal Fears of Childbirth: A Literature Review , 2009, Journal of Perinatal Education.

[24]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2015. , 2017, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[25]  K. Stoll,et al.  Childbirth Education Prior to Pregnancy? Survey Findings of Childbirth Preferences and Attitudes Among Young Women , 2015, The Journal of Perinatal Education.

[26]  K. Stoll,et al.  Vicarious Birth Experiences and Childbirth Fear: Does It Matter How Young Canadian Women Learn About Birth? , 2013, The Journal of Perinatal Education.