Estimating relative noise to signal in DNA microarray data

A method was proposed for estimating noise relative to signal in microarray data. A signal to noise index, SNI, was defined and used to measure the level of signal compared to the noise contained in two microarray data sets. Simulations were conducted to generate the quantitative relationship between the SNI and its measurement of relative noise. The method was applied to two well known microarray data sets. Relative noise was estimated for both data sets, and the results were consistent with the observations in the original papers, demonstrating the proposed method is reliable for estimating relative noise in microarray data.

[1]  Hongyue Dai,et al.  Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis , 2006, Bioinform..

[2]  Bryan Frank,et al.  Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms , 2005, Nature Methods.

[3]  Daniel J. Park,et al.  A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridization-based technologies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Simon Frantz,et al.  An array of problems , 2005, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[5]  L. Ein-Dor,et al.  Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. , 2006, Nature biotechnology.

[7]  Yoganand Balagurunathan,et al.  Noise factor analysis for cDNA microarrays. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray , 1995, Science.

[9]  J. Ioannidis Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery? , 2005, The Lancet.

[10]  Kenneth H Buetow,et al.  Interlaboratory comparability study of cancer gene expression analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[11]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[12]  Ryszard Maleszka,et al.  Microarray reality checks in the context of a complex disease , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Norimichi Tsumura,et al.  Noise Analysis of Duplicated Data on Microarrays Using Mixture Distribution Modeling , 2007 .

[14]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms , 2005, Nature Methods.

[15]  Eliot Marshall,et al.  Getting the Noise Out of Gene Arrays , 2004, Science.

[16]  T.K. Das,et al.  Removal of Hybridization and Scanning Noise From Microarrays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[17]  R. Lempicki,et al.  Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  M. Sarwal,et al.  In praise of arrays , 2009, Pediatric Nephrology.

[19]  Stefan Michiels,et al.  Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy , 2005, The Lancet.

[20]  Evelyn Strauss,et al.  Arrays of Hope , 2006, Cell.

[21]  Y. Tu,et al.  Quantitative noise analysis for gene expression microarray experiments , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Chang Hee Kim,et al.  Three microarray platforms: an analysis of their concordance in profiling gene expression , 2005, BMC Genomics.