Prediction of 90Y Radioembolization Outcome from Pretherapeutic Factors with Random Survival Forests

Our objective was to predict the outcome of 90Y radioembolization in patients with intrahepatic tumors from pretherapeutic baseline parameters and to identify predictive variables using a machine-learning approach based on random survival forests. Methods: In this retrospective study, 366 patients with primary (n = 92) or secondary (n = 274) liver tumors who had received 90Y radioembolization were analyzed. A random survival forest was trained to predict individual risk from baseline values of cholinesterase, bilirubin, type of primary tumor, age at radioembolization, hepatic tumor burden, presence of extrahepatic disease, and sex. The predictive importance of each baseline parameter was determined using the minimal-depth concept, and the partial dependency of predicted risk on the continuous variables bilirubin level and cholinesterase level was determined. Results: Median overall survival was 11.4 mo (95% confidence interval, 9.7–14.2 mo), with 228 deaths occurring during the observation period. The random-survival-forest analysis identified baseline cholinesterase and bilirubin as the most important variables (forest-averaged lowest minimal depth, 1.2 and 1.5, respectively), followed by the type of primary tumor (1.7), age (2.4), tumor burden (2.8), and presence of extrahepatic disease (3.5). Sex had the highest forest-averaged minimal depth (5.5), indicating little predictive value. Baseline bilirubin levels above 1.5 mg/dL were associated with a steep increase in predicted mortality. Similarly, cholinesterase levels below 7.5 U predicted a strong increase in mortality. The trained random survival forest achieved a concordance index of 0.657, with an SE of 0.02, comparable to the concordance index of 0.652 and SE of 0.02 for a previously published Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion: Random survival forests are a simple and straightforward machine-learning approach for prediction of overall survival. The predictive performance of the trained model was similar to a previously published Cox regression model. The model has revealed a strong predictive value for baseline cholinesterase and bilirubin levels with a highly nonlinear influence for each parameter.

[1]  P. Galle,et al.  Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Trials.

[2]  H. Rudney,et al.  Studies on cholinesterase: 1. Cholinesterase and pseudo-cholinesterase. , 1943, The Biochemical journal.

[3]  M. Reiser,et al.  Radioembolization of Symptomatic, Unresectable Neuroendocrine Hepatic Metastases Using Yttrium-90 Microspheres , 2012, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[4]  Marcus Hacker,et al.  Nomogram including pretherapeutic parameters for prediction of survival after SIRT of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer , 2013, European Radiology.

[5]  A. Haug,et al.  Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[7]  Martin Sill,et al.  Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  M. Reiser,et al.  Defining predictors for long progression-free survival after radioembolisation of hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine origin , 2013, European Radiology.

[9]  W. Sommer,et al.  Robust evidence for long-term survival with 90Y radioembolization in chemorefractory liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer , 2016, European Radiology.

[10]  Hemant Ishwaran,et al.  Identifying Important Risk Factors for Survival in Patient With Systolic Heart Failure Using Random Survival Forests , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[11]  I. Steffen,et al.  Y90 Radioembolization in chemo-refractory metastastic, liver dominant colorectal cancer patients: outcome assessment applying a predictive scoring system , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[12]  Xi Chen,et al.  Random survival forests for high‐dimensional data , 2011, Stat. Anal. Data Min..

[13]  M. Ingrisch,et al.  Pre-therapeutic factors for predicting survival after radioembolization: a single-center experience in 389 patients , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Carsten Denkert,et al.  Cutoff Finder: A Comprehensive and Straightforward Web Application Enabling Rapid Biomarker Cutoff Optimization , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Hemant Ishwaran,et al.  Random Survival Forests , 2008, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.

[16]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Radiomic Analysis Reveals Prognostic Information in T1-Weighted Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Glioblastoma , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[17]  P. Malfertheiner,et al.  The effectiveness of selective internal radiation therapy in challenging cases of liver-predominant unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2014, Future oncology.