Training and transfer of training in the search for camouflaged targets

How do observers become proficient at finding camouflaged targets? Does gaining proficiency in locating a target in one camouflage search situation improve performance in novel camouflage situations? We examined these questions by having participants first perform a difficult camouflage search task for three sessions and, in the last session, search for novel camouflaged targets. Near-perfect transfer of training was observed, with participants finding targets in novel camouflage situations almost as quickly as in highly familiar search situations. Previous research has suggested that an “object search” strategy rather than a “background search” strategy is one reason camouflage search can be slow and inaccurate. Eye movement analyses suggest that a more background-focused strategy was not necessary for improved performance and was not responsible for transfer. Another experiment explicitly instructed participants to search background regions, rather than regions containing salient objects, and provided participants feedback regarding the location of their own fixations. Surprisingly, even in this condition, participants did not devote more oculomotor attention to background regions. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Supplemental figures for this article can be downloaded from app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

[1]  M. J. Chantler,et al.  Visual search for a target against a 1/fβ continuous textured background , 2008, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  G. Zelinsky Using Eye Saccades to Assess the Selectivity of Search Movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  J. Theeuwes Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  14. Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform conneectedness , 1996 .

[8]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[9]  Amanda Ellison,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Some evidence of specificities , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of target-background similarity on visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[11]  Walter R. Boot,et al.  Detecting Transient Changes in Dynamic Displays: The More You Look, the Less You See , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[12]  M. Proulx Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  A. Oliva,et al.  Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks , 2002, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  J. McCarley,et al.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  L. Itti,et al.  Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes , 2006, Vision Research.

[17]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements , 2004 .

[21]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Visual Skills in Airport-Security Screening , 2004, Psychological science.

[22]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency , 1981, Vision Research.

[24]  G. Zelinsky A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .

[27]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[29]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  Roles of salience and strategy in conjunction search. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[32]  Xin Chen,et al.  Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Learning Pop-out Detection: Specificities to Stimulus Characteristics , 1996, Vision Research.

[34]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.